[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14995358#comment-14995358
]
Sqoop QA bot commented on SQOOP-2669:
-------------------------------------
Testing file
[SQOOP-2669.patch|https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12771190/SQOOP-2669.patch]
against branch sqoop2 took 0:58:34.996088.
{color:red}Overall:{color} -1 due to an error(s), see details below:
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Clean was successful
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch applied correctly
{color:red}ERROR:{color} Patch does not add/modify any test case
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} License check passed
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Patch compiled
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All unit tests passed (executed 1612 tests)
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} Test coverage did not decreased
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1868/artifact/patch-process/cobertura_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} No new findbugs warnings
([report|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1868/artifact/patch-process/findbugs_report.txt])
{color:green}SUCCESS:{color} All integration tests passed (executed 93 tests)
Console output is available
[here|https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-SQOOP-Build/1868/console].
This message is automatically generated.
> Sqoop2: Drop Links and Jobs servlet
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2669
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 1.99.6
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2669.patch
>
>
> Similarly as we've dropped {{ConnectorsServlet}} back in SQOOP-2544, I would
> like to propose dropping {{LinksServlet}} and {{JobsServlet}}. My reasoning
> is that those two servlets doesn't offer any new functionality - they are
> just exposing functionality already available in {{LinkServlet}} and
> {{JobServlet}}. From git/JIRA history it's not clear to me what was the
> reason to add them in the first place and hence I would prefer to have one
> public interface less to worry about.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
