[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15003262#comment-15003262
]
Hudson commented on SQOOP-2669:
-------------------------------
SUCCESS: Integrated in Sqoop2 #946 (See
[https://builds.apache.org/job/Sqoop2/946/])
SQOOP-2669. Sqoop2: Drop Links and Jobs servlet (hshreedharan:
[https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=sqoop.git&a=commit&h=9b9c494df57fd3d78a332fab4af85fa39f4d22c9])
* server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/server/v1/JobsServlet.java
* server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/server/v1/LinksServlet.java
* server/src/main/java/org/apache/sqoop/server/SqoopJettyServer.java
> Sqoop2: Drop Links and Jobs servlet
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SQOOP-2669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-2669
> Project: Sqoop
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Affects Versions: 1.99.6
> Reporter: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Assignee: Jarek Jarcec Cecho
> Fix For: 1.99.7
>
> Attachments: SQOOP-2669.patch
>
>
> Similarly as we've dropped {{ConnectorsServlet}} back in SQOOP-2544, I would
> like to propose dropping {{LinksServlet}} and {{JobsServlet}}. My reasoning
> is that those two servlets doesn't offer any new functionality - they are
> just exposing functionality already available in {{LinkServlet}} and
> {{JobServlet}}. From git/JIRA history it's not clear to me what was the
> reason to add them in the first place and hence I would prefer to have one
> public interface less to worry about.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
