Thanks Rupert, Reto for your ideas.. I went through Apache Clerazza project by checking out the source from the git repo at [1].I think the webID integration code that Reto refers to is at [2]? Please correct me if I'm wrong. How about we make it working again? Regarding the ssl http problems maybe we can ask Eclipse Communication Framework [3](ECF) guys to collaborate.
As you have listed down revoking the WebID in Clerazza and in-effect Stanbol can bring so many benefits to it as a semantic access-control and authentication framework. WebID integration can be very useful in the entity disambiguation as well. I would love to know if this can become a possible GSoC project. Thanks, Dileepa [1] https://github.com/apache/clerezza [2] https://github.com/apache/clerezza/tree/trunk/platform.security.foafssl [3] http://wiki.eclipse.org/ECF On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < [email protected]> wrote: > > @Rupert: With regard to your opinion on using EntityHub as an index > rather > > than the primary storage for the knowledge base, can you please elaborate > > more on why do you think so? Maybe Wiki-Link or Freebase [3] is a good > > option for such a knowledge base? > > The Entityhub is designed to play the role of an index & local cache. > It was not designed to manage knowledge. Because of that I would > recommend to use the knowledge base that does best fit your data > (Triple Store, Graph Data Base, SQL, NoSQL ...) and then use the CRUD > interface of the Entityhub to create ManagedSites with those data > needed for EntiyLinking and Similarity queries. > > Note that Enhancement Engines can also directly interact with the > knowledge base (e.g. if the want to modify the knowledge base such as > adding a mention example or creating an unknown Entity). However the > Entityhub ensures really fast lookups as required for EntityLinking. > > best > Rupert > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler [email protected] > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >
