Hi, many people have invested lots of work into their UIMA chains, and those chains are just working fine. For these people the UIMA integration allows reuse their stuff in web apps. But if you plan to build a project from the ground up in 2013 you should look first what is there in Stanbol, and only for those enhancement steps Stanbol cannot solve for you, try find suitable UIMA engines.
Cheers Mihály On 17 May 2013 17:51, Mike Kimber <[email protected]> wrote: > Bertrand, > > Thanks I'd seen the first link, which is what prompted my original > question i.e. Why would you want to do this and not just do it all in > Stanbol. Is it a scalability or Tooling thing? > > Thanks > > Mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 17 May 2013 15:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Apache Stanbol vs Apache UIMA? > > Hi, > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Mike Kimber <[email protected]> wrote: > > ...Can anyone articulate for me the difference between Apache Stanbol > Apache UIMA?... > > Note that work has already been done to run UIMA pipelines in Stanbol, see > > http://blog.iks-project.eu/uima-apache-stanbol-integration-2/ > and > http://stanbol.markmail.org/search/?q=uima > > -Bertrand >
