Hi Joseph,
sorry for the late response, but I was offline the last two weeks.
This indicates that the
enhancer.engines.linking.typeField
is not correctly processed by the EntityLinking engine.
I will try to replicate this with the geonames.org vocabulary simple
by configuring "geonames:featureCode" as typeField.
Thx for reporting I will keep you updated about that.
best
Rupert
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Joseph M'Bimbi-Bene
<jbi...@object-ive.com> wrote:
> Hello everybody, i'm having a problem with the entityhubLinking engine.
> I refactored my vocabulary so that the type is no longer specified by the
> "rdf:type" predicate but by the "edfAcronyme:type", then configured the
> "type field" parameter of the engine to the full URI of "edfAcronyme". But
> in the rdf answer, there is no entity-type field. Actually, some
> EntityAnnotations have en entity-type and some others don't.
>
> Here is an excerpt of the rdf describing my refactored entity (curling the
> managed site where it is stored):
>
> <rdf:RDF
> *xmlns:j.1="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#"*>
>
> <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI";>
> *<j.1:type rdf:resource="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#Acronyme"/>*
> </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
>
> here is a piece of the text used to enhance:
> "Monsieur Machin Groupe EMI: cellule performance EDF"
>
> here is an excerpt of the rdf i get as the output - EntityAnnotation with
> "entity-type":
>
> <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="urn:enhancement-1f443226-3f8b-aee9-ab31-6ca9a34dbaae">
> <j.4:extracted-from
> rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/>
> <j.4:confidence
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double";>1.0</j.4:confidence>
> <j.4:entity-type
> rdf:resource="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#Acronyme"/>
> <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/>
> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/>
> <j.4:entity-label>EMI</j.4:entity-label>
> <j.2:created
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime";>2013-08-02T10:02:28.668Z</j.2:created>
> <j.2:creator
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator>
> <j.4:entity-reference
> rdf:resource="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI"/>
> <j.3:site>EDFAcronymeMS</j.3:site>
> <j.2:relation
> rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-cfd996c5-b949-8698-36ea-80d22902bfcf"/>
> </rdf:Description>
>
> and now in the same result, EntityAnnotation without "entity-type",
> for the same entity:
>
> <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="urn:enhancement-52cdf80e-64ed-9f1c-c4bb-6a2d222f732d">
> <j.4:extracted-from
> rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/>
> <j.4:confidence
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double";>1.0</j.4:confidence>
> <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/>
> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/>
> <j.4:entity-label>EMI</j.4:entity-label>
> <j.2:created
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime";>2013-08-02T10:02:28.659Z</j.2:created>
> <j.2:creator
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator>
> <j.4:entity-reference
> rdf:resource="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI"/>
> <j.3:site>EDFImplantationMS</j.3:site>
> <j.2:relation
> rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-cfd996c5-b949-8698-36ea-80d22902bfcf"/>
> </rdf:Description>
>
>
> Just for your information, the engine does spot another entity, "EDF", but
> no EntityAnnotation with an "entity-type" field. Here it is :
>
> <rdf:Description
> rdf:about="urn:enhancement-8c54a60d-9854-f1bf-476d-07402c6dd90b">
> <j.4:extracted-from
> rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/>
> <j.4:confidence
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double";>1.0</j.4:confidence>
> <rdf:type
> rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/>
> <rdf:type rdf:resource="http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/>
> <j.4:entity-label>EDF</j.4:entity-label>
> <j.2:created
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime";>2013-08-02T10:02:28.660Z</j.2:created>
> <j.2:creator
> rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string";>org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator>
> <j.4:entity-reference
> rdf:resource="http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2012/EDFimplantation.owl#EDF"/>
> <j.3:site>EDFImplantationMS</j.3:site>
> <j.2:relation
> rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-1df9ca88-f6db-8394-878f-dc566f048a80"/>
> </rdf:Description>
>
>
> Here is part of the config of my engine :
> enhancer.engines.linking.labelField="rdfs:label"
> enhancer.engines.linking.typeField="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#type";
> stanbol.enhancer.engine.name="EDFAcronymeMSLinking"
>
> And now the config of the chain:
> stanbol.enhancer.chain.weighted.chain=["langdetect","opennlp-sentence","opennlp-token","opennlp-pos","EDFAcronymeMSLinking"]
>
> just to be sure i don't reference the wrong linking engine
>
>
> Hope that helps you, either finds where i made a mistake, or a
> potential bug in the engine.
>
> Best Regards, Joseph
--
| Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com
| Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907
| A-5500 Bischofshofen
