Hello, sorry for the late answer. The strange thing is that it works for some other vocabularies ... i don't know if it is random or what. Anyway, thanks for taking a look
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Rupert Westenthaler < rupert.westentha...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Joseph, > > sorry for the late response, but I was offline the last two weeks. > > This indicates that the > > enhancer.engines.linking.typeField > > is not correctly processed by the EntityLinking engine. > > I will try to replicate this with the geonames.org vocabulary simple > by configuring "geonames:featureCode" as typeField. > > Thx for reporting I will keep you updated about that. > > best > Rupert > > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Joseph M'Bimbi-Bene > <jbi...@object-ive.com> wrote: > > Hello everybody, i'm having a problem with the entityhubLinking engine. > > I refactored my vocabulary so that the type is no longer specified by the > > "rdf:type" predicate but by the "edfAcronyme:type", then configured the > > "type field" parameter of the engine to the full URI of "edfAcronyme". > But > > in the rdf answer, there is no entity-type field. Actually, some > > EntityAnnotations have en entity-type and some others don't. > > > > Here is an excerpt of the rdf describing my refactored entity (curling > the > > managed site where it is stored): > > > > <rdf:RDF > > *xmlns:j.1="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#"*> > > > > <rdf:Description rdf:about="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI";> > > *<j.1:type rdf:resource="http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#Acronyme > "/>* > > </rdf:Description> > > </rdf:RDF> > > > > here is a piece of the text used to enhance: > > "Monsieur Machin Groupe EMI: cellule performance EDF" > > > > here is an excerpt of the rdf i get as the output - EntityAnnotation with > > "entity-type": > > > > <rdf:Description > > rdf:about="urn:enhancement-1f443226-3f8b-aee9-ab31-6ca9a34dbaae"> > > <j.4:extracted-from > > > rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/> > > <j.4:confidence > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double > ">1.0</j.4:confidence> > > <j.4:entity-type rdf:resource=" > http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#Acronyme"/> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/> > > <j.4:entity-label>EMI</j.4:entity-label> > > <j.2:created > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime > ">2013-08-02T10:02:28.668Z</j.2:created> > > <j.2:creator > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > ">org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator> > > <j.4:entity-reference rdf:resource=" > http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI"/> > > <j.3:site>EDFAcronymeMS</j.3:site> > > <j.2:relation > > rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-cfd996c5-b949-8698-36ea-80d22902bfcf"/> > > </rdf:Description> > > > > and now in the same result, EntityAnnotation without "entity-type", > > for the same entity: > > > > <rdf:Description > > rdf:about="urn:enhancement-52cdf80e-64ed-9f1c-c4bb-6a2d222f732d"> > > <j.4:extracted-from > > > rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/> > > <j.4:confidence > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double > ">1.0</j.4:confidence> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/> > > <j.4:entity-label>EMI</j.4:entity-label> > > <j.2:created > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime > ">2013-08-02T10:02:28.659Z</j.2:created> > > <j.2:creator > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > ">org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator> > > <j.4:entity-reference rdf:resource=" > http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#EMI"/> > > <j.3:site>EDFImplantationMS</j.3:site> > > <j.2:relation > > rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-cfd996c5-b949-8698-36ea-80d22902bfcf"/> > > </rdf:Description> > > > > > > Just for your information, the engine does spot another entity, "EDF", > but > > no EntityAnnotation with an "entity-type" field. Here it is : > > > > <rdf:Description > > rdf:about="urn:enhancement-8c54a60d-9854-f1bf-476d-07402c6dd90b"> > > <j.4:extracted-from > > > rdf:resource="urn:content-item-sha1-ad1d782269ed8e2ea5c4cd7bf8ff8997cd745327"/> > > <j.4:confidence > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#double > ">1.0</j.4:confidence> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/EntityAnnotation"/> > > <rdf:type rdf:resource=" > http://fise.iks-project.eu/ontology/Enhancement"/> > > <j.4:entity-label>EDF</j.4:entity-label> > > <j.2:created > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#dateTime > ">2013-08-02T10:02:28.660Z</j.2:created> > > <j.2:creator > > rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string > ">org.apache.stanbol.enhancer.engines.entitylinking.engine.EntityLinkingEngine</j.2:creator> > > <j.4:entity-reference > > rdf:resource=" > http://www.semanticweb.org/ontologies/2012/EDFimplantation.owl#EDF"/> > > <j.3:site>EDFImplantationMS</j.3:site> > > <j.2:relation > > rdf:resource="urn:enhancement-1df9ca88-f6db-8394-878f-dc566f048a80"/> > > </rdf:Description> > > > > > > Here is part of the config of my engine : > > enhancer.engines.linking.labelField="rdfs:label" > > enhancer.engines.linking.typeField=" > http://www.edf.fr/EdfAcronyme.owl#type"; > > stanbol.enhancer.engine.name="EDFAcronymeMSLinking" > > > > And now the config of the chain: > > > stanbol.enhancer.chain.weighted.chain=["langdetect","opennlp-sentence","opennlp-token","opennlp-pos","EDFAcronymeMSLinking"] > > > > just to be sure i don't reference the wrong linking engine > > > > > > Hope that helps you, either finds where i made a mistake, or a > > potential bug in the engine. > > > > Best Regards, Joseph > > > > -- > | Rupert Westenthaler rupert.westentha...@gmail.com > | Bodenlehenstraße 11 ++43-699-11108907 > | A-5500 Bischofshofen >
