Hi Enrico

Just to make sure I understand: You upgraded to the latest clerezza.ext
jena bundles and are having the same exception you had in the first place?

Cheers,
Reto


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:30 AM, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi,
> I write down some notes even if I don't see much progress...
>
> I followed the stack trace step by step looking at bundles that provide
> the packages (from the Felix Packages tool), here is the sequence:
>
> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLogFactory =>
> org.slf4j:jcl.over.slf4j 1.6.6
> org.apache.http => org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore-nio
> org.apache.jena => org.apache.clerezza.ext:org.apache.jena.tdb
> com.hp.hpl.jena => org.apache.clerezza.ext:org.apache.jena.tdb
> org.apache.stanbol.reasoners.web => I know this...
>
> then org.apache.stanbol.reasoners.web when there is the code I know that
> is calling a method from Jena to load a resource from http.
> But this only shows where packages should be kept from, not which is
> actually the origin of the ones loaded in the current classpath, that deal
> to the exception.
>
> I also noticed that  has a set of jars embedded in the classpath,
> including jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar , but this is not exported so I can't
> see how it should affect my classpath.
>
> I am stuck here, for the moment.
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
>
>
> On 19 November 2013 20:59, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Reto,
>>
>>
>> On 19 November 2013 20:50, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, it looks like we have two options here:
>>>
>>>> 1) Upgrade jena to 2.11.0 . This would be something to do at some point.
>>>> Unfortunately this implies switch the dependencies to the org.apache.*
>>>> one.
>>>> Package names should be the same - not 100% sure.
>>>>
>>> In Clerezza the switch was quite painless. Also in fusepool we are using
>>> jena 2.11 and tdb 1.0 and had no issues with the Stanbol components used.
>>>
>> This is promising. I would fix the problem with the Reasoners services
>> first, then we may want to discuss the upgrade of Jena, of course.
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Reto
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> enridaga
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> enridaga
>

Reply via email to