Hi Reto,
I'll drop an email there, then...



On 5 December 2013 21:00, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com> wrote:

> Hi Enrico
>
> Puzzling....The OSGi Samurais on the felix mailing list might be able to
> say more.....
>
> Cheers,
> Reto
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:51 PM, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I just did some more analysis...
>>
>> I monitored the class loading from the jvm output (using the divine
>> -verbose:class option).
>> When I call a service, these classes from commons logging are loaded:
>>
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.Log from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.NoOpLog from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog$1 from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SimpleLog from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLocationAwareLog from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLogFactory from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.LogConfigurationException from
>> slinginstall:jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.6.jar]
>>
>> But then these are loaded the first time I refer to RIOT in my code, i.e.
>> doing model.read(url) :
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.LogFactory from
>> slinginstall:org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLogFactory from
>> slinginstall:org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.Log from
>> slinginstall:org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLocationAwareLog from
>> slinginstall:org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT.jar]
>> [Loaded org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLog from
>> slinginstall:org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT.jar]
>>
>> I am not really an osgi samurai, but as far as I know the code is executed
>> from the reasoners.web class loader, so I don’t understand why these
>> classes are loaded *again* from the clerezza/tdb bundle (without this
>> being
>> visible from the osgi console!). Why my class loader does not simply
>> receive the OSGi shared versions?
>> FWIW org.apache.jena.tdb-0.4-SNAPSHOT does not export
>> org.apache.commons.logging.
>>
>> The only way I was able to make it work is to not use RIOT to read from
>> remotely, but implement my own http resolver.
>>
>> But more than this, I want to understand how this stuff is behaving like
>> that!
>>
>> Bests,
>> Enrico
>>
>>
>>
>> On 5 December 2013 20:47, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Reto, all,
>> >
>> >
>> > On 2 December 2013 12:06, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Enrico
>> >>
>> >> Just to make sure I understand: You upgraded to the latest clerezza.ext
>> >> jena bundles and are having the same exception you had in the first
>> place?
>> >>
>> > I am just working at stanbol trunk, the reasoners/web artifact do not
>> > explicitly refer to clerezza.ext, the osgi bundle imports jena (it has a
>> > ugly * in the actual version in svn, but cleaning it up doesn't
>> improve).
>> >
>> > Cheers
>> > Enrico
>> >
>> >
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Reto
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:30 AM, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi,
>> >>> I write down some notes even if I don't see much progress...
>> >>>
>> >>> I followed the stack trace step by step looking at bundles that
>> provide
>> >>> the packages (from the Felix Packages tool), here is the sequence:
>> >>>
>> >>> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.SLF4JLogFactory =>
>> >>> org.slf4j:jcl.over.slf4j 1.6.6
>> >>> org.apache.http => org.apache.httpcomponents:httpcore-nio
>> >>> org.apache.jena => org.apache.clerezza.ext:org.apache.jena.tdb
>> >>> com.hp.hpl.jena => org.apache.clerezza.ext:org.apache.jena.tdb
>> >>> org.apache.stanbol.reasoners.web => I know this...
>> >>>
>> >>> then org.apache.stanbol.reasoners.web when there is the code I know
>> that
>> >>> is calling a method from Jena to load a resource from http.
>> >>> But this only shows where packages should be kept from, not which is
>> >>> actually the origin of the ones loaded in the current classpath, that
>> deal
>> >>> to the exception.
>> >>>
>> >>> I also noticed that  has a set of jars embedded in the classpath,
>> >>> including jcl-over-slf4j-1.6.4.jar , but this is not exported so I
>> can't
>> >>> see how it should affect my classpath.
>> >>>
>> >>> I am stuck here, for the moment.
>> >>>
>> >>> Enrico
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On 19 November 2013 20:59, enridaga <enrid...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Hi Reto,
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 19 November 2013 20:50, Reto Bachmann-Gmür <r...@wymiwyg.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Hi,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> FWIW, it looks like we have two options here:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> 1) Upgrade jena to 2.11.0 . This would be something to do at some
>> >>>>>> point.
>> >>>>>> Unfortunately this implies switch the dependencies to the
>> >>>>>> org.apache.* one.
>> >>>>>> Package names should be the same - not 100% sure.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> In Clerezza the switch was quite painless. Also in fusepool we are
>> >>>>> using jena 2.11 and tdb 1.0 and had no issues with the Stanbol
>> components
>> >>>>> used.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> This is promising. I would fix the problem with the Reasoners
>> services
>> >>>> first, then we may want to discuss the upgrade of Jena, of course.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Enrico
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> Cheers,
>> >>>>> Reto
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>>> enridaga
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>> enridaga
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > enridaga
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> enridaga
>>
>
>


-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
enridaga

Reply via email to