Hello! We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as part of some of our data products. We do this via the REST API. Originally we were using the content hub to store all the documents but saw higher than expected failures. The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content types / encoding.
I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the only available book on Stanbol was not sufficient. If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would be interested in investing the time to learn to codebase. Thanks! On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri < raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear community, > we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol very flexible to > enhance content, specially those unstructured ones. > For that regards connections with other projects, we have done some > thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql backends for big > data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement enrichment of > existent document repositories, that's a common request. > Regards, > Raffaele. > > > 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com>: > > > Hi there, > > Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for us to do NLP > > and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move towards a nosql > > storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? Also, what > about > > upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? Anyway, great > > tool, really hope this doesn't die!!! > > > > Regards, > > Antero > > > > On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, < > > bdelacre...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > ...I participated > > > > also in the development of the Java client, so I could take the > > > > responsibility of bringing that one as well... > > > > > > FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left the > > > Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a community point > > > of view, as an experienced Apache member. > > > > > > A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its core, but as > > > its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to bring > > > everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a slightly less > > > focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active committers > > > and PMC members by involving them directly here. > > > > > > That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of people who > > > need similar functionality. > > > > > > -Bertrand > > > > > > -- Andrew Valencik Data Scientist Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/valencik> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio <http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f>
