> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high. I recall having issues 
> with the documentation initially and the only
> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient.
> 
> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would be 
> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase.

I second this!

Perhaps (I know it's very difficult to organize synchronous time for a 
globally-distributed group but perhaps) we could try to organize a boot camp 
meeting on-line? In other words, those people who (like Andrew and myself) 
would be willing to contribute as part of a larger effort could get some 
virtual time with one or more committers/PMC members to take an in-depth tour 
of the system from the developer point of view and hear about the outstanding 
architectural issues, maybe start to figure out points of contribution.

I realize this would make a lot of demands on the committers involved, but it 
might be a way to inject some fuel into the effort.

Just an idea...

---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library

> On Jan 18, 2017, at 9:54 AM, Andrew Valencik <and...@affin.io> wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> 
> We use Stanbol in production to annotate text with entities as part of some
> of our data products.
> We do this via the REST API.
> Originally we were using the content hub to store all the documents but saw
> higher than expected failures.
> The entity engines seem a bit more resilient to varying content types /
> encoding.
> 
> I agree that the barrier to contribution is very high.
> I recall having issues with the documentation initially and the only
> available book on Stanbol was not sufficient.
> 
> If there was renewed interest in bringing on other developers I would be
> interested in investing the time to learn to codebase.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 5:53 AM Raffaele Palmieri <
> raffaele.palmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Dear community,
>> we are using 0.12 version with content hub. I find Stanbol very flexible to
>> enhance content, specially those unstructured ones.
>> For that regards connections with other projects, we have done some
>> thoughts about the use with Apache Marmotta with nosql backends for big
>> data scenarios. Also with Apache Manifold to implement enrichment of
>> existent document repositories, that's a common request.
>> Regards,
>> Raffaele.
>> 
>> 
>> 2017-01-16 22:41 GMT+01:00 Antero Duarte <a.fduar...@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Hi there,
>>> Stanbol is very useful for me! Greatest and easiest tool for us to do NLP
>>> and linked data. Has there been any discussion to move towards a nosql
>>> storage solution, or is solr still the best thing for us? Also, what
>> about
>>> upgrading solr? How much work would be involved in that? Anyway, great
>>> tool, really hope this doesn't die!!!
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Antero
>>> 
>>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, 4:43 p.m. Bertrand Delacretaz, <
>>> bdelacre...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:28 PM, Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> ...I participated
>>>>> also in the development of the Java client, so I could take the
>>>>> responsibility of bringing that one as well...
>>>> 
>>>> FWIW, I won't be involved in decisions about this as I left the
>>>> Stanbol PMC a while ago - I'm just commenting from a community point
>>>> of view, as an experienced Apache member.
>>>> 
>>>> A while ago Stanbol was "larger" and more focused on its core, but as
>>>> its community becomes smaller (IIUC) it's probably good to bring
>>>> everyone here, as much as possible, even it it means a slightly less
>>>> focused codebase. This can also help recruiting more active committers
>>>> and PMC members by involving them directly here.
>>>> 
>>>> That might make Stanbol more sustainable, as a community of people who
>>>> need similar functionality.
>>>> 
>>>> -Bertrand
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> -- 
> 
> Andrew Valencik
> 
> Data Scientist
> 
> Affinio <http://www.affinio.com> | Twitter <http://twitter.com/valencik> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/andrew-valencik-472b2aa4>
> 
> Discover your personal brand for free with Discovery by Affinio
> <http://t.sidekickopen36.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XZs2zGp1-W3Ljs1C5vfVNRVQJSG056dPwzdmbQgC02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.affinio.com%2F&si=5220160139427840&pi=8070b80d-4591-486c-891e-f9743f8a6c3f>

Reply via email to