Hi Furkan, Thanks! I will take a look ASAP in order to get them merged
Cheers, Rafa On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:40 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've just created STANBOL-1473, STANBOL-1474, STANBOL-1475 and STANBOL-1476 > and created PRs for them! > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:39 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi Rafa & Roman, > > > > I've already contributed to Apache Stanbol with my 15 issues. You can > > check them from here: > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Stanbol%20AND%20reporter%20%3D%20kamaci%20 > > > > @Rafa I'll check backlog and also file new issues to keep my > contribution. > > > > @Roman I believe that Apache Stanbol has a great future and I'll try to > > contribute its source code and improve its community as much as I can. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Furkan KAMACI > > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:37 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> Hi Everyone, > >> > >> top-posting here to summarize a month worth of this thread: > >> 1. it sounds like there's still interest in keeping Stanbol alive > >> 2. it sounds like at least Phillip Rhodes, Dileepa Jayakody and > >> Rafa Haro are enthusiastic enough about Stanbol's future > >> and are willing to invest some amount of their time into it. > >> > >> Hence, I'd like to propose that we start a formal PMC vote on adding > >> these > >> individuals to the PMC in the hope that this will help to revitalize the > >> project. > >> > >> If there are no objections -- I'm going to start a PMC vote thread over > >> the > >> weekend. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Roman. > >> > >> On 2018/10/25 02:50:03, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would > >> > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't had > >> > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain > >> > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to contribute. > >> > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, but I > >> > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start > >> > contributing to Stanbol. > >> > > >> > > >> > Phil > >> > ~~~ > >> > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM > >> > > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody > >> > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. > >> > > > >> > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since > >> 2014. > >> > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the project > >> for > >> > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my > >> contributions > >> > > have been very low since. > >> > > > >> > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. > >> > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the > >> bugs and > >> > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active again, > >> and see > >> > > the senior developers back on the list :) > >> > > > >> > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. > >> > > > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > Dileepa > >> > > > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary > >> > > > >> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > > > >> > > > Hi Roman, > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we > have > >> > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few months. > >> There > >> > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 "active" > >> > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we > would > >> be > >> > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and so > >> on but, > >> > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on the > >> backlog, > >> > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I think > >> this > >> > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within the > >> same > >> > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in > taking > >> the > >> > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this > >> situation has > >> > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing lists > >> is > >> > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is > time > >> to > >> > > > archive the project. > >> > > > > >> > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project > into > >> the > >> > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest > opinion > >> it is > >> > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or extend > >> the > >> > > > community with new members interested in further improvements and > >> uses > >> > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. > >> > > > > >> > > > Warm regards from Seville > >> > > > > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >> > > > > >> > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org > > > >> wrote: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi! > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion > >> > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's > >> > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics > >> > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem > >> > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of mailing > >> > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the current > 22 > >> PMC > >> > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean writing > >> > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the PMC): > >> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to > >> consider > >> > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or > >> > > > > > some of the project's active users. > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > Thoughts? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Hi Again! > >> > > > > > >> > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this > thread > >> so > >> > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with at > >> least 3 > >> > > > > reasonably active PMC > >> > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be end > >> up > >> > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC members, > if > >> > > > > there's enough enthusiastic > >> > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into > >> "rebooting" > >> > > > > the PMC that way. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol continues > as > >> an > >> > > > > active Apache project -- please > >> > > > > reply to this thread. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Thanks, > >> > > > > Roman. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >
