Hi Furkan, Sorry I didn't. This weekend is probably a good time for me. Will review and eventually merge them before next Monday
Thanks! El El jue, 29 nov 2018 a las 17:48, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> escribió: > Hi Rafa, > > Did you have a chance to check my PRs? > > Kind Regards, > Furkan KAMACI > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 11:51 AM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Furkan, >> >> Thanks! I will take a look ASAP in order to get them merged >> >> Cheers, >> Rafa >> >> On Sat, Nov 24, 2018 at 9:40 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I've just created STANBOL-1473, STANBOL-1474, STANBOL-1475 and >> STANBOL-1476 >> > and created PRs for them! >> > >> > Kind Regards, >> > Furkan KAMACI >> > >> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:39 PM Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Rafa & Roman, >> > > >> > > I've already contributed to Apache Stanbol with my 15 issues. You can >> > > check them from here: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20Stanbol%20AND%20reporter%20%3D%20kamaci%20 >> > > >> > > @Rafa I'll check backlog and also file new issues to keep my >> > contribution. >> > > >> > > @Roman I believe that Apache Stanbol has a great future and I'll try >> to >> > > contribute its source code and improve its community as much as I can. >> > > >> > > Kind Regards, >> > > Furkan KAMACI >> > > >> > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:37 AM Roman Shaposhnik <r...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Hi Everyone, >> > >> >> > >> top-posting here to summarize a month worth of this thread: >> > >> 1. it sounds like there's still interest in keeping Stanbol alive >> > >> 2. it sounds like at least Phillip Rhodes, Dileepa Jayakody and >> > >> Rafa Haro are enthusiastic enough about Stanbol's future >> > >> and are willing to invest some amount of their time into it. >> > >> >> > >> Hence, I'd like to propose that we start a formal PMC vote on adding >> > >> these >> > >> individuals to the PMC in the hope that this will help to revitalize >> the >> > >> project. >> > >> >> > >> If there are no objections -- I'm going to start a PMC vote thread >> over >> > >> the >> > >> weekend. >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Roman. >> > >> >> > >> On 2018/10/25 02:50:03, Phillip Rhodes <motley.crue....@gmail.com> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > Hey guys, I'm definitely still very interested in Stanbol and would >> > >> > like to see it remain an active project here at ASF. I haven't had >> > >> > much opportunity to contribute up to this point, but I remain >> > >> > committed to getting more deeply involved and starting to >> contribute. >> > >> > It's hard to commit to a specific level or a specific timeline, >> but I >> > >> > can say that my plan is definitely to try and get equipped to start >> > >> > contributing to Stanbol. >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Phil >> > >> > ~~~ >> > >> > This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 5:48 AM Dileepa Jayakody >> > >> > <dileepajayak...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Hi Roman, Rafa and fellow Stanbolers. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I'm Dileepa Jayakody, a committer of Apache Stanbol project since >> > >> 2014. >> > >> > > While I was engaging in the dev list and development of the >> project >> > >> for >> > >> > > couple of years, due to other engagements, I must admit my >> > >> contributions >> > >> > > have been very low since. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > However, I think there is a lot we can do to revive the project. >> > >> > > Looking at the Jira tracker[1] I think we can start by fixing the >> > >> bugs and >> > >> > > work towards a new release. Would love to see Stanbol active >> again, >> > >> and see >> > >> > > the senior developers back on the list :) >> > >> > > >> > >> > > I will start to engage again as much as possible. >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks, >> > >> > > Dileepa >> > >> > > >> > >> > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/STANBOL/summary >> > >> > > >> > >> > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 1:15 PM Rafa Haro <rh...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> > >> > > >> > >> > > > Hi Roman, >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > I'm Rafa Haro, current PMC member of Apache Stanbol. I think we >> > have >> > >> > > > discussed this situation a couple of times in the past few >> months. >> > >> There >> > >> > > > were a similar inquiry recently and back then, at least 3 >> "active" >> > >> > > > (including me) PMC members responded with similar answers: we >> > would >> > >> be >> > >> > > > somehow available for bug fixing, attend the mailing lists and >> so >> > >> on but, >> > >> > > > because of lack of time, further contributions like working on >> the >> > >> backlog, >> > >> > > > community development....had to be eventually abandoned. I >> think >> > >> this >> > >> > > > situation is extensible to most of current committers. Within >> the >> > >> same >> > >> > > > threads, there were Stanbol's users that were interesting in >> > taking >> > >> the >> > >> > > > project out of this "blockage" but the reality is that this >> > >> situation has >> > >> > > > remained the same for months and the activity at the mailing >> lists >> > >> is >> > >> > > > minimum. So maybe yeah, probably it is a shame and maybe it is >> > time >> > >> to >> > >> > > > archive the project. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > I'm not sure which are the implications of putting the project >> > into >> > >> the >> > >> > > > Attic from the organisation point of view, but in my honest >> > opinion >> > >> it is >> > >> > > > that or, somehow, I don't know exactly how, try to find or >> extend >> > >> the >> > >> > > > community with new members interested in further improvements >> and >> > >> uses >> > >> > > > cases around Stanbol that could lead to resurrect the project. >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > Warm regards from Seville >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 3:15 AM Roman Shaposhnik < >> r...@apache.org> >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 9:47 AM Roman Shaposhnik < >> r...@apache.org >> > > >> > >> wrote: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Hi! >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > a few months ago Shane Curcuru started this discussion >> > >> > > > > > around the level of PMC activity in the project: >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> >> > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/7f85aecc5180b85d888cf63a8136521739e5e1ee74ae167abd3ab9ff@%3Cdev.stanbol.apache.org%3E >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > at the time it seemed like the consensus was: there's >> > >> > > > > > enough folks interested in at least overseeing mechanics >> > >> > > > > > of the PMC. However if a few months since it would seem >> > >> > > > > > that we're back to where Shane's discussion started. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Now, this is, of course, based on my cursory review of >> mailing >> > >> > > > > > list and JIRA activity, but it seems that out of the >> current >> > 22 >> > >> PMC >> > >> > > > > > members only one or two are active (and I don't mean >> writing >> > >> > > > > > code active, but at least supporting "mechanics" of the >> PMC): >> > >> > > > > > http://people.apache.org/phonebook.html?pmc=stanbol >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > I'm wondering, perhaps, if it would benefit the project to >> > >> consider >> > >> > > > > > expanding the PMC to include the other 4 committers and/or >> > >> > > > > > some of the project's active users. >> > >> > > > > > >> > >> > > > > > Thoughts? >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Hi Again! >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > it seems that there hasn't been much of a feedback on this >> > thread >> > >> so >> > >> > > > > I'm expanding it to users@ as well. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > The concern here is that unless the community comes up with >> at >> > >> least 3 >> > >> > > > > reasonably active PMC >> > >> > > > > members to make sure that the project can continue it may be >> end >> > >> up >> > >> > > > > "archived" into Apache Attic. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Now, these PMC members do NOT have to be existing PMC >> members, >> > if >> > >> > > > > there's enough enthusiastic >> > >> > > > > folks in the user community we can definitely look into >> > >> "rebooting" >> > >> > > > > the PMC that way. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > If anybody is interested in making sure that Stanbol >> continues >> > as >> > >> an >> > >> > > > > active Apache project -- please >> > >> > > > > reply to this thread. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > > Thanks, >> > >> > > > > Roman. >> > >> > > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> >> > > >> > >> >
