On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 4:53 PM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:
> Now, to clear the confusion I created: the timing numbers I posted in the > attachment stdcxx-1056-timings.tgz to STDCXX-1066 (09/11/2012) showed that a > perfectly forwarding, no caching public interface (exemplified by a changed > grouping) performs better than the current implementation. It was that test > case that I hoped you could time, perhaps on SPARC, in both MT and ST > builds. The t.cpp program is for MT, s.cpp for ST. I got your patch, and have tested it. I have created two Experiments (that's what they are called) with the SunPro Performance Analyzer. Both experiments are targeting race conditions and deadlocks in the instrumented program, and both experiments are running the 22.locale.numpunct.mt program from the stdcxx test harness. One experiment is with your patch applied. The other experiment is with our (Solaris) patch applied. Here are the results: 1. with your patch applied: http://s247136804.onlinehome.us/22.locale.numpunct.mt.1.er.nts/ 2. with our (Solaris) patch applied: http://s247136804.onlinehome.us/22.locale.numpunct.mt.1.er.ts/ --Stefan -- Stefan Teleman KDE e.V. stefan.tele...@gmail.com
