On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Liviu Nicoara <nikko...@hates.ms> wrote:
> In the meantime I would like to stress again that __rw_get_numpunct is
> perfectly thread-safe and does not need extra locking for perfect
> forwarding.
So, by removing the test for
if (!(_C_flags & _RW::__rw_gr))
(or any other bitmask for that matter), the functions which were
thread-unsafe - and were exhibiting all the symptoms of a run-time
race condition -, magically became thread-safe?
I have looked *extensively* at the code in __rw_get_numpunct. It is
inherently thread-unsafe.
--Stefan
--
Stefan Teleman
KDE e.V.
stefan.tele...@gmail.com
