Hi Daniel, And where does that diff/patch land?
Best regards, Pierre Smits *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* Services & Solutions for Cloud- Based Manufacturing, Professional Services and Retail & Trade http://www.orrtiz.com On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Pierre, > patches for the site are most welcome. > You can use the CMS to check out the site source and make an anonymous > diff/patch. > > With regards, > Daniel. > > On 2015-03-25 14:43, Pierre Smits wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> +Apache Steve is software for conducting a vote using the STV - Single >> +Transferrable Vote - voting algorithm. The tool grew out of the voting >> +system used to elect the Apache Software Foundation Board of >> +Directors. >> >> Could be better by stating: >> Apache STeVe is election software using various voting algorithms (STV - >> Single Transferrable Vote, YNA - Yes, No or Abstain, etc.). For more >> optional voting algorithms see the Apache STeVe webpages at >> http://steve.apache.org. >> >> The solutions grew out of the voting system used by the Apache Software >> Foundation to elect the Board of Directors. It is the works of the Apache >> STeVe Project. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Pierre Smits >> >> *ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >> Services & Solutions for Cloud- >> Based Manufacturing, Professional >> Services and Retail & Trade >> http://www.orrtiz.com >> >> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Rich, >>> unfortunately not, but you know....stuff can happen :) >>> If you're interested, I would LOOOOVE for someone to start writing some >>> short docs/paragraphs about the various voting types we aim to support. I >>> know it's all there on Wikipedia, but still, it'd be nice to have >>> something >>> locally. >>> >>> With regards, >>> Daniel. >>> >>> >>> On 2015-03-25 14:22, Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> Hmm. For some reason, I thought STeVe was Universal Commit Bit. Bummer. >>>> >>>> Here's a slightly less useless README. I know it's not much, but one has >>>> to start somewhere. >>>> >>>> >>>> >
