[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14950681#comment-14950681
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1084:
---------------------------------------

Github user revans2 commented on the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/785#issuecomment-146926754
  
    @jerrypeng Perhaps we can do a hybrid approach, where we have validation 
for complex types made up of something that is a bit ugly, but expressive.  And 
a set of simple annotations for common types. for example
    
    ```
    @Validate(type=Map.class, nullAllowed=false,
        key=@Validate(type=String.class),
        value=@Validate(type=Number.class, min=0, max=500))
    public static final String MY_MAP_CONF="my.map.conf";
    
    @Validate(type=List.class, value=@Validate(type=String.class))
    public static final String MY_LIST_OF_STRINGS="my.list.of.strings";
    
    @IntValidator(min=0, nullAllowed=false)
    public static final String MY_INT_CONF="my.int.conf";
    
    //And for the really strange types
    @Validate(type=List.class, value=@Validate(type=Map.class, 
validator=RegistryValidator.class))
    public static final String TOPOLOGY_METRICS_CONSUMER_REGISTER = 
"topology.metrics.consumer.register";
    ```


> Improve Storm config validation process to use java annotations instead of 
> *_SCHEMA format
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1084
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1084
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Boyang Jerry Peng
>            Assignee: Boyang Jerry Peng
>
> So currently we specify validators:
>  public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = 
> "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms";
>  public static final Object STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS_SCHEMA = 
> ConfigValidation.IntegerValidator;
> A better way to do this is using annotations.  Something like:
> @IntegerValidator
>  public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = 
> "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms";
> Do this has many advantages. For one you can stack multiple annotations:
> @IntegerValidator
> @NotNull
>  public static final String STORM_MESSAGING_NETTY_MIN_SLEEP_MS = 
> "storm.messaging.netty.min_wait_ms";
> And we don't have to write another validator for strings that cannot be null
> And we can pass parameters into the annotations: 
> @PositiveIntegerValidator(notNull=true)
>   public static final String DRPC_REQUEST_TIMEOUT_SECS  = 
> "drpc.request.timeout.secs";
> instead of having to write another validator: 
> ConfigValidation.NotNullPosIntegerValidator for checking for not null



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to