[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15058839#comment-15058839
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-898:
--------------------------------------

Github user rfarivar commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/921#discussion_r47699328
  
    --- Diff: 
storm-core/test/jvm/backtype/storm/scheduler/resource/TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.java
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
    + * or more contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file
    + * distributed with this work for additional information
    + * regarding copyright ownership.  The ASF licenses this file
    + * to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the
    + * "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance
    + * with the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + * <p>
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + * <p>
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package backtype.storm.scheduler.resource;
    +
    +import backtype.storm.Config;
    +import backtype.storm.generated.Bolt;
    +import backtype.storm.generated.SpoutSpec;
    +import backtype.storm.generated.StormTopology;
    +import backtype.storm.generated.TopologySummary;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.ExecutorDetails;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.INimbus;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.IScheduler;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.SupervisorDetails;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.Topologies;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.TopologyDetails;
    +import backtype.storm.scheduler.WorkerSlot;
    +import backtype.storm.spout.SpoutOutputCollector;
    +import backtype.storm.task.OutputCollector;
    +import backtype.storm.task.TopologyContext;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.BoltDeclarer;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.OutputFieldsDeclarer;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.SpoutDeclarer;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.TopologyBuilder;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.base.BaseRichBolt;
    +import backtype.storm.topology.base.BaseRichSpout;
    +import backtype.storm.tuple.Fields;
    +import backtype.storm.tuple.Tuple;
    +import backtype.storm.tuple.Values;
    +import backtype.storm.utils.Time;
    +import backtype.storm.utils.Utils;
    +import org.slf4j.Logger;
    +import org.slf4j.LoggerFactory;
    +
    +import java.util.Collection;
    +import java.util.HashMap;
    +import java.util.LinkedList;
    +import java.util.List;
    +import java.util.Map;
    +import java.util.Random;
    +import java.util.Set;
    +import java.util.regex.Matcher;
    +import java.util.regex.Pattern;
    +
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertFalse;
    +import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
    +
    +public class TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler {
    +    private static final Logger LOG = 
LoggerFactory.getLogger(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.class);
    +
    +    public static List<TopologyDetails> getListOfTopologies(Config config) 
{
    +
    +        List<TopologyDetails> topos = new LinkedList<TopologyDetails>();
    +
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-1", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 2, 20));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-2", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 8, 30));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-3", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 16, 30));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-4", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 16, 20));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-5", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 24, 30));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-6", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 2, 0));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-7", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 8, 0));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-8", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 16, 15));
    +        topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-9", 
config, 5, 15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 16, 8));
    +        
topos.add(TestUtilsForResourceAwareScheduler.getTopology("topo-10", config, 5, 
15, 1, 1, Time.currentTimeSecs() - 24, 9));
    +        return topos;
    +    }
    +
    +    public static List<String> getListOfTopologiesCorrectOrder() {
    +        List<String> topos = new LinkedList<String>();
    +        topos.add("topo-7");
    +        topos.add("topo-6");
    +        topos.add("topo-9");
    +        topos.add("topo-10");
    +        topos.add("topo-8");
    +        topos.add("topo-4");
    +        topos.add("topo-1");
    +        topos.add("topo-5");
    +        topos.add("topo-3");
    +        topos.add("topo-2");
    +        return topos;
    +    }
    +
    +    public static Map<String, SupervisorDetails> genSupervisors(int 
numSup, int numPorts, Map resourceMap) {
    +        Map<String, SupervisorDetails> retList = new HashMap<String, 
SupervisorDetails>();
    +        for (int i = 0; i < numSup; i++) {
    +            List<Number> ports = new LinkedList<Number>();
    +            for (int j = 0; j < numPorts; j++) {
    +                ports.add(j);
    +            }
    +            SupervisorDetails sup = new SupervisorDetails("sup-" + i, 
"host-" + i, null, ports, resourceMap);
    +            retList.put(sup.getId(), sup);
    +        }
    +        return retList;
    +    }
    +
    +    public static Map<ExecutorDetails, String> 
genExecsAndComps(StormTopology topology, int spoutParallelism, int 
boltParallelism) {
    +        Map<ExecutorDetails, String> retMap = new HashMap<ExecutorDetails, 
String>();
    +        int startTask = 0;
    +        int endTask = 1;
    +        for (Map.Entry<String, SpoutSpec> entry : 
topology.get_spouts().entrySet()) {
    +            for (int i = 0; i < spoutParallelism; i++) {
    +                retMap.put(new ExecutorDetails(startTask, endTask), 
entry.getKey());
    +                startTask++;
    +                endTask++;
    +            }
    +        }
    +
    +        for (Map.Entry<String, Bolt> entry : 
topology.get_bolts().entrySet()) {
    +            for (int i = 0; i < boltParallelism; i++) {
    +                retMap.put(new ExecutorDetails(startTask, endTask), 
entry.getKey());
    +                startTask++;
    +                endTask++;
    +            }
    +        }
    +        return retMap;
    +    }
    +
    +    public static TopologyDetails getTopology(String name, Map config, int 
numSpout, int numBolt,
    +                                              int spoutParallelism, int 
boltParallelism, int launchTime, int priority) {
    +
    +        Config conf = new Config();
    +        conf.putAll(config);
    +        conf.put(Config.TOPOLOGY_PRIORITY, priority);
    +        conf.put(Config.TOPOLOGY_NAME, name);
    +        conf.put(Config.TOPOLOGY_WORKER_MAX_HEAP_SIZE_MB, 
Double.MAX_VALUE);
    +        StormTopology topology = buildTopology(numSpout, numBolt, 
spoutParallelism, boltParallelism);
    +        TopologyDetails topo = new TopologyDetails(name + "-" + 
launchTime, conf, topology,
    +                0,
    +                genExecsAndComps(topology, spoutParallelism, 
boltParallelism), launchTime);
    +        return topo;
    +    }
    +
    +    public static StormTopology buildTopology(int numSpout, int numBolt,
    +                                              int spoutParallelism, int 
boltParallelism) {
    +        LOG.debug("buildTopology with -> numSpout: " + numSpout + " 
spoutParallelism: "
    +                + spoutParallelism + " numBolt: "
    +                + numBolt + " boltParallelism: " + boltParallelism);
    +        TopologyBuilder builder = new TopologyBuilder();
    +
    +        for (int i = 0; i < numSpout; i++) {
    +            SpoutDeclarer s1 = builder.setSpout("spout-" + i, new 
TestSpout(),
    +                    spoutParallelism);
    +        }
    +        int j = 0;
    +        for (int i = 0; i < numBolt; i++) {
    +            if (j >= numSpout) {
    +                j = 0;
    +            }
    +            BoltDeclarer b1 = builder.setBolt("bolt-" + i, new TestBolt(),
    +                    boltParallelism).shuffleGrouping("spout-" + j);
    +        }
    +
    +        return builder.createTopology();
    +    }
    +
    +    public static class TestSpout extends BaseRichSpout {
    +        boolean _isDistributed;
    +        SpoutOutputCollector _collector;
    +
    +        public TestSpout() {
    +            this(true);
    +        }
    +
    +        public TestSpout(boolean isDistributed) {
    +            _isDistributed = isDistributed;
    +        }
    +
    +        public void open(Map conf, TopologyContext context, 
SpoutOutputCollector collector) {
    +            _collector = collector;
    +        }
    +
    +        public void close() {
    +
    +        }
    +
    +        public void nextTuple() {
    +            Utils.sleep(100);
    +            final String[] words = new String[]{"nathan", "mike", 
"jackson", "golda", "bertels"};
    +            final Random rand = new Random();
    +            final String word = words[rand.nextInt(words.length)];
    +            _collector.emit(new Values(word));
    +        }
    +
    +        public void ack(Object msgId) {
    +
    --- End diff --
    
    empty line


> Add priorities and per user resource guarantees to Resource Aware Scheduler
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-898
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Boyang Jerry Peng
>         Attachments: Resource Aware Scheduler for Storm.pdf
>
>
> In a multi-tenant environment we would like to be able to give individual 
> users a guarantee of how much CPU/Memory/Network they will be able to use in 
> a cluster.  We would also like to know which topologies a user feels are the 
> most important to keep running if there are not enough resources to run all 
> of their topologies.
> Each user should be able to specify if their topology is production, staging, 
> or development. Within each of those categories a user should be able to give 
> a topology a priority, 0 to 10 with 10 being the highest priority (or 
> something like this).
> If there are not enough resources on a cluster to run a topology assume this 
> topology is running using resources and find the user that is most over their 
> guaranteed resources.  Shoot the lowest priority topology for that user, and 
> repeat until, this topology is able to run, or this topology would be the one 
> shot.   Ideally we don't actually shoot anything until we know that we would 
> have made enough room.
> If the cluster is over-subscribed and everyone is under their guarantee, and 
> this topology would not put the user over their guarantee.  Shoot the lowest 
> priority topology in this workers resource pool until there is enough room to 
> run the topology or this topology is the one that would be shot.  We might 
> also want to think about what to do if we are going to shoot a production 
> topology in an oversubscribed case, and perhaps we can shoot a non-production 
> topology instead even if the other user is not over their guarantee.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to