Note for reader: This may be only related to committer/PMCs.

Hi,

We recently changed our master to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT and make 1.x-branch.
Everything except "removing docs" is same between master and 1.x-branch but
now it is diverged.
New PR which is based on commit after "removing docs" can't be "merged" to
1.x-branch via "git merge" cause it also merges excluded commits.
(For example, https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1024)

I'm curious which is convenient way maintaining 1.x-branch or 2.x-branch.
If we decide to maintain 1.x-branch, it could be a pain if we need to merge
many pull requests for 0.x / 1.x after diverged.
What do you think?

For now I'm waiting for decision before backporting STORM-1482
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1482> to 1.x-branch. It's
already pushed to master, but I can't decide how to backport it to
1.x-branch. Cherry-picking would what we want?

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

Reply via email to