The 1.x branch is supposed to be for stabilizing a 1.x release, while master 
(2.x) diverges with the JStorm merger.  I thought it would be best to keep 1.x 
open temporarily to back-port features, as there were several that were close 
to going in, but didn't quite make it, and because there was at least one 
blocker waiting for a pull request, which is now up (STORM-1452)

Now that the long weekend in the US is over I think it is time to start getting 
serious about stabilizing a 1.x release.  There are a number of pull request up 
for bug fixes which I hope to merge in today/tomorrow, and I know that several 
different people are already working on the JStorm merger. So I would expect to 
see the first pull requests for JStorm go up today/tomorrw.  As more of that 
happens porting of features will become more and more difficult.  But I am not 
a stickler,  if someone thinks a feature is critically important for a 1.x 
release and they want to merge it in, go ahead, but I would prefer to only see 
bug fixes go into the 1.x-branch until we have a good release candidate.

- Bobby 

    On Sunday, January 17, 2016 8:09 PM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
 

 Note for reader: This may be only related to committer/PMCs.

Hi,

We recently changed our master to 2.0.0-SNAPSHOT and make 1.x-branch.
Everything except "removing docs" is same between master and 1.x-branch but
now it is diverged.
New PR which is based on commit after "removing docs" can't be "merged" to
1.x-branch via "git merge" cause it also merges excluded commits.
(For example, https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1024)

I'm curious which is convenient way maintaining 1.x-branch or 2.x-branch.
If we decide to maintain 1.x-branch, it could be a pain if we need to merge
many pull requests for 0.x / 1.x after diverged.
What do you think?

For now I'm waiting for decision before backporting STORM-1482
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1482> to 1.x-branch. It's
already pushed to master, but I can't decide how to backport it to
1.x-branch. Cherry-picking would what we want?

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)


  

Reply via email to