[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15143468#comment-15143468
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-1248:
---------------------------------------

Github user knusbaum commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1097#discussion_r52662537
  
    --- Diff: storm-core/src/clj/org/apache/storm/daemon/worker.clj ---
    @@ -487,11 +486,12 @@
                 )))))
     
     (defn register-callbacks [worker]
    -  (log-message "Registering IConnectionCallbacks for " (:assignment-id 
worker) ":" (:port worker))
    -  (msg-loader/register-callback (:transfer-local-fn worker)
    -                                (:receiver worker)
    -                                (:storm-conf worker)
    -                                (worker-context worker)))
    +  (let [transfer-local-fn (:transfer-local-fn worker)
    +        ^IConnection socket (:receiver worker)]
    +    (log-message "Registering IConnectionCallbacks for " (:assignment-id 
worker) ":" (:port worker))
    +    (.registerRecv socket (DeserializingConnectionCallback. (:storm-conf 
worker)
    --- End diff --
    
    @abhishekagarwal87 That's fine with me. It's true we'd have to translate it 
back to java, even if inlined.


> port  backtype.storm.messaging.loader to java
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: STORM-1248
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1248
>             Project: Apache Storm
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: storm-core
>            Reporter: Robert Joseph Evans
>            Assignee: Abhishek Agarwal
>              Labels: java-migration, jstorm-merger
>
> Just a small bit of glue code for calling transfer-local-fn when messaging 
> batch arrives.
> In the short term we may need to use an IFn, until the transfer-local-fn is 
> migrated to java too.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to