FYI: STORM-1976 and STORM-1977 is already resolved, and I filed kafka-offset-util issue to STORM-1988, and submitted pull request.
2016년 7월 20일 (수) 오후 5:50, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]>님이 작성: > As I mentioned from 1.0.2 RC3 vote, I'm -1 because of STORM-1976 and > STORM-1977, and kafka-offset-util not fuctioning (explaining below). > But based on test result for 1.1.0 RC1, I will do simple test and vote +1 > once next RC happens and it includes three issues. > > - testing with source distribution : OK > - unzip : OK > - building from source dist : OK > - how to build: running `mvn -P all-tests clean install` on unzipped > source dist. > > - testing with binary distribution (one machine) : OK > - launch daemons : OK > - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK (also terminated properly) > - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK > - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK > - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK > - change log level : OK > - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK > - log search : OK > - run WordCountTopology (multilang, remote) : OK > - run StatefulTopology (local) : OK > - run StatefulTopology (remote) : OK > - run StatefulWindowingTopology (local) : OK > - run StatefulWindowingTopology (remote) : OK > - run BlobStoreAPIWordCountTopology (remote) : OK > - test new metrics features : OK > - test kafka offset feature : Fail > - STORM-1950 broke the classpath while executing kafka-offset-util. > > For broken kafka offset feature I'll come up quick fix on this. > > Btw, I'm OK to release kafka offset feature as it is if we are OK with > this. > I think it's easy to fix, just we need to see and decide how to represent > them without occupying too much area. (I've some sketched ideas in mind > but will see how release vote is going on.) > I'd be really appreciated if Frontend / UX guys participate discussion and > contribute this side. > > Thanks, > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > > 2016년 7월 18일 (월) 오후 6:42, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]>님이 작성: > >> For leaving history: IMO we should hold on releasing 1.1.0 RC1 for the >> same reason on 1.0.2 RC3. Nimbus H/A has several issues which seems to be >> raised while adding BlobStore feature, and I filed STORM-1976 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1976> and STORM-1977 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1977> as blocker and >> critical. >> >> Thanks, >> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) >> >> 2016년 7월 16일 (토) 오후 11:18, darion.yaphet <[email protected]>님이 작성: >> >>> +1<br/><br/>1. Building from source code [SUCC]<br/>2. running test case >>> [SUCC] >>> At 2016-07-16 03:48:26, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.0 (rc1) >>> > >>> >Full list of changes in this release: >>> > >>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=4d80461a62e6f739dccff79af176bc109bc491e7 >>> > >>> >The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.0: >>> > >>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=3b65fb11287301d3d02bc9d26533985e269f32c4;hb=4d80461a62e6f739dccff79af176bc109bc491e7 >>> > >>> >The source archive being voted upon can be found here: >>> > >>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc1/apache-storm-1.1.0-src.tar.gz >>> > >>> >Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: >>> > >>> >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc1/ >>> > >>> >The release artifacts are signed with the following key: >>> > >>> > >>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd >>> > >>> >The Nexus staging repository for this release is: >>> > >>> >https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1037 >>> > >>> >Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0. >>> > >>> >When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. >>> > >>> >This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. >>> > >>> >[ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0 >>> >[ ] 0 No opinion >>> >[ ] -1 Do not release this package because... >>> > >>> >Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. >>> > >>> >-Taylor >>> >>
