[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15411803#comment-15411803
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on STORM-2026:
---------------------------------------
Github user satishd commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1616#discussion_r73873775
--- Diff:
storm-core/src/jvm/org/apache/storm/executor/spout/SpoutExecutor.java ---
@@ -79,8 +79,11 @@ public SpoutExecutor(final Map workerData, final
List<Long> executorId, Map<Stri
this.spoutThrottlingMetrics = new SpoutThrottlingMetrics();
}
- @Override
public void init(final Map<Integer, Task> idToTask) {
+ while (!stormActive.get()) {
--- End diff --
The assumption here is that this method is invoked only once. Do no we want
to handle for multiple invocations?
> Inconsistency between (SpoutExecutor, BoltExecutor) and (spout-transfer-fn,
> bolt-transfer-fn)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: STORM-2026
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2026
> Project: Apache Storm
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: storm-core
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0
> Reporter: Jungtaek Lim
> Assignee: Jungtaek Lim
>
> As I left the comment from
> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1445#discussion_r73255197 for pull
> request, there's some difference between SpoutExecutor / BoltExecutor and
> spout-transfer-fn / bolt-transfer-fn.
> While it's not that big to fix, I just want to not block port work and just
> address from here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
