Personally, merging and porting back to three branches are painful enough,
especially we don't have merging script and having verbose process (I mean
CHANGELOG).
It would be better if merging process is automated (by running script or
so), so I'd +1 to revisit Harsha's suggestion (adopting Kafka merge script)
and modify script to fit to Storm.
(It will not work if it's the case we need to handle PRs for each version
line, since 'Close' in commit log doesn't close the PR if its target branch
is not master.)

Anyway, without automation I don't want to maintain more version lines. I'm
looking at the announces from other projects, and others are only
maintaining two version lines.
Since we maintain 2.0.0 version line we can't reduce version lines to 2,
but hopefully at most 3.

Btw, let's check pending pull requests and enumerate which can be included
in 1.0.0, and start/finish review and merge them soon.
For me Supervisor V2 and Pacemaker H/A, and pending Storm SQL PRs can be
included, since they are small or in reviewing and expected to pass review
phase soon.
(And some small PRs. There're other valuable PRs in PR list but I'm not
sure we can review them soon. One example is unified API.)

One issue which is not clear is STORM-2006
<https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1595>. This is a candidate for me,
but gets blocked while reviewing. If we plan to put great effort to revise
Metric we can skip this.

Please enumerate other PRs as well if you want to include in 1.1.0.

Thanks,
Jungtaek Lim

2016년 9월 30일 (금) 오후 11:09, Bobby Evans <ev...@yahoo-inc.com.invalid>님이 작성:

> Sounds good to me.  It would be nice to get some of the new features out.
> Do we expect to maintain both 1.0.x and 1.1.x lines with bug fixes?  And if
> so for how long do we want to do this for? - Bobby
>
>     On Thursday, September 29, 2016 7:35 PM, Jungtaek Lim <
> kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>  Hi devs,
>
> It's been 5 months after releasing Storm 1.0.0, and now 1.x branch has lots
> of CHANGELOG and also pending reviews.
> It's also been a long time after 1.1.0 RC1 is canceled.
>
> I think it may be good to put some efforts to review and merge pending pull
> requests (except things which takes time to review and test), and release
> 1.1.0 soon.
>
> What do you think?
>
> I'm also open to volunteer release manager for 1.1.0 after we document the
> process of official release.
>
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>
>
>

Reply via email to