+1 for master, 1.x and 1.0.x as suggested by Taylor. Thanks, Satish.
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote: > For me master and 1.x would be good places to land, given that we are > planning to release 1.1.0 soon. > > - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) > On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 at 2:34 AM Bobby Evans <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > +1 on those. Not sure if 1.0.x is the best place as it is a new feature > > (but it is separate from storm-core so I am OK with it) - Bobby > > > > On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 12:24 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > The IP Clearance for storm-jms has passed and we are clear to import the > > code. > > > > What branches do we want it to land in? > > > > My initial thoughts are master, 1.x and 1.0.x., but I’m curious to hear > > others’ thoughts. > > > > -Taylor > > > > >
