Thanks for the input. I’ll start with master and follow up with the other branches.
-Taylor > On Oct 5, 2016, at 3:05 AM, Satish Duggana <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 for master, 1.x and 1.0.x as suggested by Taylor. > > Thanks, > Satish. > > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 2:00 AM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For me master and 1.x would be good places to land, given that we are >> planning to release 1.1.0 soon. >> >> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR) >> On Wed, 5 Oct 2016 at 2:34 AM Bobby Evans <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 on those. Not sure if 1.0.x is the best place as it is a new feature >>> (but it is separate from storm-core so I am OK with it) - Bobby >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 4, 2016 12:24 PM, P. Taylor Goetz < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>> The IP Clearance for storm-jms has passed and we are clear to import the >>> code. >>> >>> What branches do we want it to land in? >>> >>> My initial thoughts are master, 1.x and 1.0.x., but I’m curious to hear >>> others’ thoughts. >>> >>> -Taylor >>> >>> >>
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
