What are other’s thoughts on including the patch Hugo mentioned below? Cut 
another RC, or proceed with the current one?

-Taylor

> On Feb 22, 2017, at 12:41 PM, Hugo Da Cruz Louro <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> 
> +1 (non binding)
> 
> I found out that the Storm Kafka Client Test Topologies were throwing 
> SerializationException. I have submitted two patches for 
> master<https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1959> and 1.x-branch 
> <https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1958> . It would be good if we could 
> merge this before the release, but it isn’t a blocker.
> 
> Summary of Tests
> - unzipped .zip and tar.gz sources and binaries
> - mvn clean install unzipped sources
> - created uber jar for storm-solr and storm-kafka-client using pom.xml under 
> examples directory (since artifacts not published to maven yet, it required 
> the sources to first be installed in local maven repo)
> - tested storm-solr and storm-kafka-client using bundled test topologies, in 
> local and remote cluster mode (everything is working fine after these two 
> patches for master<https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1959> and 1.x-branch 
> <https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/1958>  to fix a SerializationException)
> - killed and restarted zookeeper with nimbus and supervisors up and it 
> recovered as expected
> 
> Thanks,
> Hugo
> 
> On Feb 21, 2017, at 7:47 AM, Bobby Evans 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> +1 ran some basic tests on a distributed cluster.  Built from source and all 
> unit tests passed.
> 
> 
> - Bobby
> 
> On Sunday, February 19, 2017, 8:38:59 PM CST, Xin Wang 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:+1 Ran some 
> tests in cluster mode. And I saw the js RAT issue has been
> fixed by Jungtaek.
> 
> - Xin
> 
> 2017-02-20 8:30 GMT+08:00 Jungtaek Lim 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>:
> 
> We've been introducing new changes via release note news. I'm not sure
> Taylor already wrote one, but if he didn't, I'm happy to simply describe
> it.
> 
> Diff-ing docs directory between 1.0.x branch (or 1.0.3) and 1.x branch
> (1.1.0 rc1) might help to determine the improvement or new features.
> 
> - Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2017년 2월 19일 (일) 오전 2:15, Julien Nioche 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>님이
> 작성:
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> I can't find a description of how 1.1.x differs from 1.0.x, is that
> available somewhere?
> 
> BTW all the versions on JIRA are marked as 'unreleased'
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Julien
> 
> On 18 February 2017 at 12:16, Jungtaek Lim 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> source
> 
> - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> -- source, zip : OK
> 
> - extract file
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> -- source, zip : OK
> 
> - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK
> 
> - build source with JDK 7
> -- source, tar.gz : seeing RAT issue, others are OK
> 
> - build source dist
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> 
> - build binary dist
> -- source, tar.gz : OK
> 
> binary
> 
> - verify file (signature, MD5, SHA)
> -- binary, tar.gz : OK
> -- binary, zip : OK
> 
> - extract file
> -- binary, tar.gz :  OK
> -- binary, zip : OK
> 
> - diff-ing extracted files between tar.gz and zip : OK
> 
> - launch daemons : OK
> - run RollingTopWords (local) : OK
> - run RollingTopWords (remote) : OK
>  - activate / deactivate / rebalance / kill : OK
>  - logviewer (worker dir, daemon dir) : OK
>  - change log level : OK
>  - thread dump, heap dump, restart worker : OK
>  - log search : OK
> - run WordCountTopology (multilang, remote) : OK
> - run StatefulTopology (local) : OK
> - run StatefulTopology (remote) : OK
> - run StatefulWindowingTopology (remote) : OK
> 
> - run Storm SQL features (with --artifacts) : OK (via testing Kafka &
> csv/tsv schema)
> 
> I've seen RAT issue from newly added js files, but it's not about
> LICENSE
> issue, just exclusion from RAT plugin is missing. (I'll take care of it
> immediately.)
> 
> Thanks,
> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> 
> 2017년 2월 18일 (토) 오전 4:42, P. Taylor Goetz 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>님이 작성:
> 
> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.0 (rc1)
> 
> Full list of changes in this release:
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
> plain;f=CHANGELOG.md;hb=17a2017fb644e353fb2a0f5bf50d400ee28036ba
> 
> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.0:
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=
> 
> 75b7d808d10674ff580beb031ae970fe94e97615;hb=
> 17a2017fb644e353fb2a0f5bf50d40
> 0ee28036ba
> 
> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> 
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
> 1.0-rc1/apache-storm-1.1.0-src.tar.gz
> 
> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> 
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.0-rc1/
> 
> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> 
> 
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
> plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> 
> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> 
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> orgapachestorm-1045
> 
> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0.
> 
> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.0
> [ ]  0 No opinion
> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> 
> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> 
> -Taylor
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> *Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering*
> 
> http://www.digitalpebble.com
> http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/
> #digitalpebble <http://twitter.com/digitalpebble>
> 
> 

Reply via email to