Thanks Roshan for bring this up.

For me moving toward 2.0.0 makes more sense.

I know master branch has similar issue (DRPC) and it also has
not-yet-ported things but if we are going to struggle with 1.x branch issue
again and again, Storm 2.0.0 will never come. Another recent headache issue
is JDK 7 vs JDK 8. Patch for master easily breaks for 1.x branch due to
this, and we just had to cancel another 1.1.0 RC vote.

We might want to discuss how to handle webservice like DRPC (My feeling is
that current approach is somewhat kinda hacky.), but we can initiate
different thread for more details.

If we really need long time to discuss above, I'm even OK to revert DRPC
port and start 2.0.0 with webservices unported, (DRPC, UI, Logviewer) and
address them at 2.1 or other minor versions.

Any other opinions?

- Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)

2017년 3월 1일 (수) 오전 9:27, Roshan Naik <ros...@hortonworks.com>님이 작성:

Lately (about a week and half maybe) it has not been possible to get the
1.x-branch to build inside IntelliJ. None of the modules are able to locate
the  LocalCluster class (which is a clojure class). Previously, every once
in a while, I used to get this problem in the storm-starter module and was
able to get around it by doing a mvn clean install –DskipTests on the cmd
line and then doing a full rebuild of the project in IntelliJ.

Now the problem has become a lot more endemic (modules like storm-sql,
storm-*-examples, etc.). And the above workaround doesn’t help. Spent many
futile hours trying to work around the build issue within Intellij (both
2015 and 2016 versions and using different Clojure plugins).

There seems to possible ways to move forward:


-          Somebody here knows what magic to do work address this. And we
can all use that.

-          Bring in the java port of LocalCluster.clj from master branch to
1.x (STORM-1281). I spend a little time to see if this was easy to do, but
appears kind of complicated due to number of files involved and
dependencies on prior patches. Somebody familiar with the original porting
effort may be better person to take this up.

Thoughts ?

-Roshan

Reply via email to