I am also in agreement that we should not delay the 1.2.0 release for too long, 
but in order to release it a few things need to be kept in mind:

 - If we want to avoid releasing 1.3.0 soon or at all, that means that we 
should include in 1.2.0 as many important features (e.g. metricsV2) as possible 
within a reasonable time frame. Also to avoid as much back porting as possible 
one should really get all features that we foresee we want to maintain in 1.2.0 
right away, and then simply maintain them there.  However it’s a fact of life 
that if a bug is found and it is a blocker, it will have to be back ported.
 
- STORM-2153 details that the new metrics requirements were driven by the 
users. Therefore if this feature is highly important and sought after, it may 
not make much sense to release 1.2.0 without it. If we do release 1.2.0 without 
the metrics, does it mean that metrics will go only in 2.0? I would conjecture 
that most production deployments will take a while to upgrade to 2.0 even after 
it is released. That means that they will still be running Storm without the 
benefit of the new metrics.

- Several fixes have got in storm-kafka-client.  There have been a lot of 
changes and I wonder to which degree they have been system tested in addition 
the existing unit tests

@Alexandre, since you are using storm-kafka-client and have filed some bugs and 
driven some feature requests, I would like to ask if you could help us within 
what is reasonably possible for you with the following:

 - system test the latest storm-kafka-client changes in your 
test/pre-production environment
 - provide some information on about your setup, 
      - how you are using storm-kafka-client
      - how it is performing
      - Kafka brokers, number of topics/partitions, storm parallelism, and some 
info about your network
- if it is reasonable to do so share some of your tests such that we can also 
test it at our end. 
- Tell us specific things that you would like us to test

Thanks,
Hugo

> On Nov 16, 2017, at 11:49 PM, Stig Rohde Døssing <stigdoess...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> I agree with Jungtaek, if metrics v2 can go in very soon it should go in,
> otherwise I'd rather release 1.2.0 now and work on getting 2.0.0 ready for
> release.
> 
> 1.x and master have drifted pretty far apart, and it's causing a lot of
> porting work at this point. 1.x still has a lot of Clojure code, storm-core
> hasn't been split yet in that branch and it's also targeting JDK 1.7. It's
> seems rare at this point that a PR cherry picks cleanly onto 1.x from
> master.
> 
> I've linked the list of issues that are only fixed in 2.0.0 and not 1.x, to
> illustrate how far ahead 2.0.0 is.
> 
> https://pste.eu/p/9CJT.html
> 
> 2017-11-17 5:41 GMT+01:00 Arun Iyer <ai...@hortonworks.com>:
> 
>> Hi Taylor,
>> 
>> Is it https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2203 ?
>> 
>> 
>> I think it would be great to get this in 1.2 release. Can we try to
>> address the issues in a week or so and get this in?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Arun
>> 
>> On 11/17/17, 7:13 AM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <ptgo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> The original idea for the 1.2 release was that would introduce the
>> metrics v2 work (and there is additional work required there, so I
>> understand a desire not to delay the release). Do we want to stick with
>> that, or deviate? If the latter, would we do a 1.3 release for metrics?
>>> 
>>> As far as a 1.1.2 release I’m fine with releasing that at any time.
>>> 
>>> -Taylor
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 15, 2017, at 6:24 PM, Jungtaek Lim <kabh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I think we could start release phase for both 1.1.2 and 1.2.0 when
>>>> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2423 will be merged.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>> 
>>>> 2017년 11월 16일 (목) 오전 7:00, Alexandre Vermeerbergen <
>> avermeerber...@gmail.com>님이
>>>> 작성:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I'd love to see a Storm 1.2.0 released: it's a perfect schedule for me
>> for
>>>>> test any Release Candidate that might be available if it happens soon.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Alexandre
>>>>> 
>>>>> 2017-11-15 7:29 GMT+01:00 Arun Mahadevan <ar...@apache.org>:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Looks like we are only waiting on https://issues.apache.org/
>>>>>> jira/browse/STORM-2546 .
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Are there any other issues which are blockers for Storm 1.2.0? Would
>> be
>>>>>> great to see the 1.2.0 release out soon as it has a lot of critical
>>>>> fixes.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Arun
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to