Agree that release should include Netty upgrade (STORM-2918)

> On Feb 1, 2018, at 3:39 AM, Satish Duggana <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> -1 (binding) to include STORM-2918
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918>
> 
> Thanks,
> Satish.
> 
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:25 PM, Artem Ervits <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> -1
>> Please include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918
>> 
>> On Jan 31, 2018 1:59 PM, "Stig Rohde Døssing" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> The log indicates a bug. We can remove the WARN messages pretty easily,
>> but
>>> we'd still be throwing and catching an exception for each processed
>> record.
>>> 
>>> We're storing some data in Kafka alongside committed offsets that lets us
>>> only apply the EARLIEST and LATEST strategies for where the consumer
>> should
>>> start if the topology is redeployed, rather than applying them every time
>>> the worker restarts. This was added as a fix to a bug I introduced in
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2666, where we error if the
>>> spout tries to emit offsets that have already been committed (that never
>>> happens during normal operation, but if the spout is restarted and using
>>> EARLIEST it can happen). The new behavior of EARLIEST/LATEST is also much
>>> more useful than the old one IMO.
>>> 
>>> The bug is that we're only storing the metadata if the spout is
>> configured
>>> for at-least-once. We also support at-most-once and an "anything goes"
>>> setting, and when either of those are used, the spout tries to read the
>>> metadata that isn't there and complains about it. If we just remove the
>>> log, EARLIEST and LATEST will behave differently for at-least-once and
>>> at-most-once/no-guarantee.
>>> 
>>> The patch makes changes to ensure that we store metadata in all cases.
>>> 
>>> 2018-01-31 19:47 GMT+01:00 Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>>> Are we waiting for https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2538 to start
>>> the
>>>> next RC ?
>>>> 
>>>> This patch seem to contain more changes than just fixing a logging
>> issue.
>>>> Can we only address the concern raised about logs filling with WARN
>>>> messages and address the rest in the next release or does the logs
>>> indicate
>>>> some bug which is a blocker for 1.2.0 ?
>>>> 
>>>> - Arun
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On 1/29/18, 12:30 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Cancelling this RC in order to address Stig’s concerns.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Jan 26, 2018, at 4:11 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc2)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
>>>> 2.0-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.2.0:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=
>>>> 17a4645d7d65f5a7a08a50b5185c0fc52e82692f;hb=
>>> 458aa1cb696097cf07d4466aa7417c
>>>> 7b89662221
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
>>>> 2.0-rc2/apache-storm-1.2.0-src.tar.gz
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
>> 2.0-rc2/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
>>>> plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>> orgapachestorm-1056
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.2.0.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.2.0
>>>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to