I'm working on copying storm-kafka-client, but as I noticed to other thread [1], copying incurs change of storm-core. While 1.1.x-branch requires small change, but 1.0.x-branch requires non-trivial change and I have to track the changes related to storm-kafka-client.
So I've suggested the alternative: deprecation of 1.0.x-branch in other thread [1]. Please voice your opinion regarding this. Thanks, Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVIoR) 1. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/3a1ac1f1c396723d9ff9effaf8ee839e0ada5df3a88bee9df0d4602c@%3Cdev.storm.apache.org%3E 2018년 2월 6일 (화) 오전 7:02, Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]>님이 작성: > It's been merged, thanks for the quick review. I think storm-kafka-client > should be ready to be copied to the other two branches. > > 2018-02-05 22:00 GMT+01:00 P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>: > > > Yes, here’s the pull request: > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2547 > > > > Once that’s merged, I can sync storm-kafka-client from 1.x-branch to > > 1.1.x-branch and 1.0.x-branch and cut new RCs. > > > > -Taylor > > > > On Feb 5, 2018, at 1:27 PM, Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > STORM-2918 has been merged to 1.x branch. > > > > > > Now looks like we waiting for 1.x versions of > > > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2538 and > > https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2537 ? > > > > Can we get the next RC as soon as the above two are merged to 1.x ? > > > > Thanks, > > Arun > > > > > > > > On 2/1/18, 12:55 AM, "[email protected] on behalf of Artem Ervits" < > > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > > > > -1 > > Please include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918 > > > > On Jan 31, 2018 1:59 PM, "Stig Rohde Døssing" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > The log indicates a bug. We can remove the WARN messages pretty easily, > but > > we'd still be throwing and catching an exception for each processed > record. > > > > We're storing some data in Kafka alongside committed offsets that lets us > > only apply the EARLIEST and LATEST strategies for where the consumer > should > > start if the topology is redeployed, rather than applying them every time > > the worker restarts. This was added as a fix to a bug I introduced in > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2666, where we error if the > > spout tries to emit offsets that have already been committed (that never > > happens during normal operation, but if the spout is restarted and using > > EARLIEST it can happen). The new behavior of EARLIEST/LATEST is also much > > more useful than the old one IMO. > > > > The bug is that we're only storing the metadata if the spout is > configured > > for at-least-once. We also support at-most-once and an "anything goes" > > setting, and when either of those are used, the spout tries to read the > > metadata that isn't there and complains about it. If we just remove the > > log, EARLIEST and LATEST will behave differently for at-least-once and > > at-most-once/no-guarantee. > > > > The patch makes changes to ensure that we store metadata in all cases. > > > > 2018-01-31 19:47 GMT+01:00 Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]>: > > > > Are we waiting for https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2538 to start > > > > the > > > > next RC ? > > > > This patch seem to contain more changes than just fixing a logging issue. > > Can we only address the concern raised about logs filling with WARN > > messages and address the rest in the next release or does the logs > > > > indicate > > > > some bug which is a blocker for 1.2.0 ? > > > > - Arun > > > > > > > > > > On 1/29/18, 12:30 PM, "P. Taylor Goetz" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Cancelling this RC in order to address Stig’s concerns. > > > > -Taylor > > > > On Jan 26, 2018, at 4:11 PM, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.2.0 (rc2) > > > > Full list of changes in this release: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1. > > > > 2.0-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html > > > > > > The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.2.0: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h= > > > > 17a4645d7d65f5a7a08a50b5185c0fc52e82692f;hb= > > > > 458aa1cb696097cf07d4466aa7417c > > > > 7b89662221 > > > > > > The source archive being voted upon can be found here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1. > > > > 2.0-rc2/apache-storm-1.2.0-src.tar.gz > > > > > > Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here: > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.2.0-rc2/ > > > > The release artifacts are signed with the following key: > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_ > > > > plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd > > > > > > The Nexus staging repository for this release is: > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/ > > > > orgapachestorm-1056 > > > > > > Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.2.0. > > > > When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release. > > > > This vote will be open for at least 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.2.0 > > [ ] 0 No opinion > > [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... > > > > Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release. > > > > -Taylor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
