Github user zd-project commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2743#discussion_r199531108
  
    --- Diff: 
storm-server/src/main/java/org/apache/storm/metric/timed/TimerDecorated.java ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
    +/**
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more 
contributor license agreements.
    + * See the NOTICE file distributed with this work for additional 
information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to you under the Apache License, Version 2.0 
(the "License");
    + * you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.  You 
may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
    + * software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" 
BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and 
limitations under the License.
    + */
    +
    +package org.apache.storm.metric.timed;
    +
    +import com.codahale.metrics.Timer;
    +
    +import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference;
    +
    +public interface TimerDecorated extends AutoCloseable {
    +
    +    boolean hasStopped();
    +
    +    default boolean hasStopped(final AtomicReference<Timer.Context> 
timing) {
    +        return timing.get() == null;
    +    }
    +
    +    long stopTiming();
    --- End diff --
    
    I'm actually modeling so after the implementation of dropwizard's Timer 
class. Basically the object can behave like an Autocloseable and put in 
try-with-resource block or specialized collections (such as TimeCacheMap). In a 
way, close method is not for users to call and user should either invoke stop 
timing or rely on `Autocloseable`'s behavior. But yeah now I think for 
robustness maybe `stopTiming` should be idempotent instead of only a one time 
call. 


---

Reply via email to