Hugo,

Sounds good, thanks.

Jungtaek,

I don't think there are any missing tasks in STORM-2953. Once the listed
tasks are done, we should be good to delete storm-kafka. I've been holding
off on looking at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2972 because
I was hoping that https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2443 could go in
first.

2018-07-07 0:21 GMT+02:00 Hugo Louro <[email protected]>:

> I’ll take a pass at reviewing them as well.
> Thanks,
> Hugo
>
> > On Jul 6, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Jungtaek Lim <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Yeah I have been hoping that some other folks who are familiar with
> > storm-kafka-client jump in and review in time, but unfortunately it
> didn't
> > happen. Will try to review those PRs, hopefully within couple of days.
> >
> > Btw, if there're missing PRs to resolve STORM-2953
> > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2953> I'd like to ask you
> to
> > also add them here, so we can resolve the one which is effectively
> blocker
> > for Storm 2.0.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> >
> > 2018년 7월 6일 (금) 오후 9:08, Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]>님이
> 작성:
> >
> >> Hi devs,
> >>
> >> There are a couple of PRs open for changes in storm-kafka-client that
> would
> >> be nice to get reviewed. The PRs are
> >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2652
> >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2648 and
> >> https://github.com/apache/storm/pull/2590. If someone could find a
> couple
> >> of minutes to give them a look, I'd appreciate it.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
>

Reply via email to