Was verifying the performance on 2.0 and noticed that the inter worker 
messaging has fallen off a cliff .... With ConstSpoutNullBoltTopo (producer 
batch size=1k, ackers=0, workers=2) it was ~3.2mill/sec down  and now its down 
to  ~1.6mill/sec. Something has impacted this recently. Will try to narrow down 
the issue by tomorrow hopefully. Single worker numbers look good.  
-roshan
    On Friday, January 11, 2019, 2:46:14 AM PST, Stig Rohde Døssing 
<[email protected]> wrote:  
 
 Thanks Arun,

I don't have an opinion on it, just wanted to make sure that it wasn't an
oversight.

+1

Set up Storm from the binary zip file
Built storm-kafka-client-examples from the zip while pointing Maven at the
Nexus repo
Ran one of the example Kafka topologies with a single-node cluster against
a local Kafka. Verified there were no errors in the logs, clicked around in
UI.

Den tor. 10. jan. 2019 kl. 22.25 skrev Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]>:

> This is for users to use the "auto credentials" mechanism (delegation
> tokens) with HDFS/Hive/Hbase.
>
> We have been shipping it since 1.x (I think since 1.2.0 release) so that
> users can just add that directory to class path rather than building it
> separately to get the right dependencies. We could consider removing it
> from the main binary and ship it separately but it will need changes to the
> build, release and documentation and users will need to download and
> install it separately.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Arun
>
> On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 10:28, Stig Rohde Døssing <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > I think this was remarked on by Roshan in the last RC, but the binary
> > distribution has become significantly larger since 1.x. It looks like
> this
> > is down to storm-autocreds not being added to the exclusion list in
> > storm-dist/binary/final-package/src/main/assembly/binary.xml.
> >
> > Since the module isn't excluded, external/storm-autocreds contains the
> > module jar, plus all dependency jars. Is this an accident, or do we want
> to
> > include these jars in the distribution?
> >
> > Den ons. 9. jan. 2019 kl. 19.48 skrev Ethan Li <
> [email protected]
> > >:
> >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > - Built from the src, ran all the unit tests and integration tests.
> > > - Set up a single-node cluster and submit ThroughputVsLatency topology.
> > > - Checked the UI.
> > > They look good.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Ethan
> > >
> > > > On Jan 9, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Bobby Evans <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1 built from the git tag.  Ran all of the unit tests and ran some
> > manual
> > > > tests they all passed.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Bobby
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:30 PM Xin Wang <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> Built it and ran all of the tests.  Everything passed.
> > > >>
> > > >> -Xin
> > > >>
> > > >> Kishorkumar Patil <[email protected]> 于2019年1月9日周三 上午5:08写道:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1
> > > >>>
> > > >>> - built from source code and deployment works.
> > > >>> -  Ran some of the tests for UI, DRPC, ThroughputVsLatency
> > > >>> -  Validated UI bugs reported in the recent past are fixed in this
> > > >> version
> > > >>>
> > > >>> -Kishor
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 2:29 PM Arun Mahadevan <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> +1
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - Downloaded the binaries and validated signatures.
> > > >>>> - Deployed the binaries, ran some sample topologies and checked
> the
> > > UI.
> > > >>>> - Ran top level build using the source zip.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks,
> > > >>>> Arun
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> On Tue, 8 Jan 2019 at 11:03, P. Taylor Goetz <[email protected]>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 2.0.0 (rc4)
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc4/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v2.0.0:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=1eece73e8c9ed7f41d2f20f727bc7f644c499360;hb=ddee8decac57d1a4a0aa23cc76066609a2abc8d2
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc4/apache-storm-2.0.0-src.tar.gz
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-2.0.0-rc4/
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachestorm-1073
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 2.0.0
> > > >>>>> [ ]  0 No opinion
> > > >>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> -Taylor
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Xin
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>  

Reply via email to