Hi Markos, I don’t think we’re in a rush at the moment, so thank you for offering to help for the adjustments. I agree that it makes sense to approach this in small, incremental steps.
Gruß Richard On 2026/02/09 19:07:38 Markos Volikas wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Thanks for updating the logo at the various places! Looks good already. > > Regarding the fine tuning, I'd be glad to help, but I'm afraid my time > availability is very limited this time of the year. I'll let you know > when I find time to work on this. > > The updates will probably need to be in small incremental steps so that > we don't move away from the logo we voted for (e.g., I'd start by making > it symmetric). > > Best, > > Markos > > On 2/3/26 19:05, Richard Zowalla wrote: > > Hi, > > > > The vote results are > > > > Logo Variant 1 (small) > > > > +1 Julien Nioche (binding) > > +1 Tim Allison (binding) > > +1 Richard Zowalla (binding) > > +1 Martin Wiesner > > > > Logo Variant 3 > > +1 Markos Volikas (binding) > > +1 Dávid Szigecsán > > > > > > The vote passes with 3 binding votes in favor of Logo Variant 1. I’ll > > update the website and GitHub with an intermediate version, which we can > > fine-tune according to the points identified by M&P and also mentioned by > > Markos in the other thread. > > > > @Markos: Would you be willing to conduct the fine tuning as discussed in > > that thread? Otherwise, I guess, that we can also use it „as is“ for a > > while now. > > > > Gruß > > Richard >
