Hi, I checked it and I kinda liked it. Yes, it is definitely AI styled... Today I just found this page and had a deja vu: https://adk-rust.com/en
Anyway, one small thing made me feel a bit "meh" when I checked your design on desktop. The menu is hidden under a hamburger menu, which is fine on mobile, but I prefer seeing it on desktop. Besides that I really like it. Regards, Sigee Richard Zowalla <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2026. júl. 17., P, 20:33): > Perhaps just forget about that for now - I will come back to this thread > once I am more satisfied with the results. > Stay tuned. > > Gruß > Richard > > > Am 17.07.2026 um 13:30 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>: > > > > Also possible in a red version of course … if we think it it too generic > / AI style nowadays, we can also just leave it as is ;-) > > I don’t mind either way… - the branch is open for people to just play > around with it ;-) > > > > Cheers > > Richard > > > >> Am 16.07.2026 um 21:07 schrieb Richard Zowalla <[email protected]>: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I recently had a quick chat with a few folks who pointed out that the > current website's color scheme (dark red combined with black and white, > especially in the light theme) unintentionally resembles the flag of the > North German Confederation / German Empire. > >> Not the kind of association we want for the project. > >> > >> So I took that as an opportunity to try something new: a refreshed > design with a different color scheme, a one-page landing layout, and dark > mode support. > >> > >> The content itself is unchanged, and everything still complies with the > ASF requirements (self-hosted fonts, trademark notices, etc.). > >> > >> I've deployed a preview on https://stormcrawler.staged.apache.org/ and > the changes live on the „refresh“ branch. > >> > >> I'd like to gather some feedback before moving forward. Opinions, > criticism and suggestions are all welcome. > >> > >> I also tried to play around with a red version but that turned out > quite aggressive... > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Richard > > > >
