Hi, +1, I think "application.applicationId" convention is more readable.
Thanks ! On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Devs, > > As I noticed we have named most of the identity fields in the domain > classes in the REST API as "id": > applicationLevelNetworkPartition.id > childLevelNetworkPartition.id > childLevelPartition.id > partition.id > autoscalingPolicy.id > > However application identity field is named as "applicationId": > application.applicationId > > May be we could stick to a convention, WDYT? > > Thanks > > > -- > Imesh Gunaratne > > Technical Lead, WSO2 > Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos > -- Regards, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte Software Engineer WSO2 Inc. : http://wso2.com lean . enterprise . middleware email : [email protected] / [email protected] phone : +94 772492511 blog : http://manulachathurika.blogspot.com/
