I thought the other way around: application.id Since the entity name is already there, we might not need to repeat it in the property name.
Thanks On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte < [email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > +1, I think "application.applicationId" convention is more readable. > > Thanks ! > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Imesh Gunaratne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Devs, >> >> As I noticed we have named most of the identity fields in the domain >> classes in the REST API as "id": >> applicationLevelNetworkPartition.id >> childLevelNetworkPartition.id >> childLevelPartition.id >> partition.id >> autoscalingPolicy.id >> >> However application identity field is named as "applicationId": >> application.applicationId >> >> May be we could stick to a convention, WDYT? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> -- >> Imesh Gunaratne >> >> Technical Lead, WSO2 >> Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos >> > > > -- > Regards, > Manula Chathurika Thantriwatte > Software Engineer > WSO2 Inc. : http://wso2.com > lean . enterprise . middleware > > email : [email protected] / [email protected] > phone : +94 772492511 > blog : http://manulachathurika.blogspot.com/ > > > > -- Imesh Gunaratne Technical Lead, WSO2 Committer & PMC Member, Apache Stratos
