Hi, I think it really depends on the timing of when 1.0 is released.
In my point if view, the geo operators should be part of the 1.0 release as "new features". And also focus on the documentation and story line using them O:-) Florian Am Freitag, dem 25.11.2022 um 09:27 +0000 schrieb Philipp Zehnder: > Hi,<br> > > I am also in favor of releasing a 1.0 version soon after the 0.90.0 > version.<br> > > I think we do not need any new features for the 1.0 release.<br> > My suggestion would be to focus on usability improvements and bug fixes for > the 1.0 release.<br> > Especially that we have a backward compatible system and users can easily > update to newer versions.<br> > Do you have any ideas how we can ensure this? We need a way to test that > updates work as expected and do not break anything.<br> > It would be cool to have an automated approach to validate this for each > release.<br> > > Cheers,<br> > Philipp<br> > > > Von: Dominik Riemer <[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])><br> > Datum: Freitag, 25. November 2022 um 07:08<br> > An: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]) > <[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])><br> > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to release StreamPipes 1.0<br> > Hi Xin,<br> > > thanks for bringing up this important question!<br> > The current plan is to release a new version soon together with the TLP > announcement, which is currently named "0.90.0".<br> > > I totally agree that a 1.0 version gives more trust to users. So let's say we > would go for a 1.0 release after 0.90.0, what do you all think should be part > of this release and what improvements should be done? Are any > mission-critical features missing?<br> > > E.g., an important item on my list for the 1.0 release is increased test > coverage.<br> > > Cheers<br> > Dominik<br> > > > On 2022/11/25 05:07:54 Xin Wang wrote:<br> > > The current StreamPipes version is 0.70. Do we have a plan to release > > 1.0?<br> > > Because 1.x version may make users feel more mature and stable, what do > > you<br> > > think?<br> > > > > > > --<br> > > Thanks,<br> > > Xin<br> > >
