I added two points for usability in the discussion. A friend of mine works as a UX designer. I can ask him to take a look and give us some tips. If he does, we can discuss this in a community session maybe.
Florian Am Freitag, dem 02.12.2022 um 14:30 +0000 schrieb Dominik Riemer: > Thanks for your feedback!<br> > > I am especially interested in the opinion from those of you haven't followed > the project for years, as you have a "fresh" view on the system:<br> > What do you think are the biggest pain points regarding usability or where do > you see improvement potential?<br> > > I'll start a discussion on Github and we can collect any ideas there.<br> > > Cheers<br> > DOminik<br> > > > -----Original Message-----<br> > From: Xin Wang <[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])> <br> > Sent: Thursday, December 1, 2022 4:02 PM<br> > To: [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])<br> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to release StreamPipes 1.0<br> > > Hi,<br> > > Agree with you. I think we should focus on usability improvements and mature > APIs for the 1.0 release. It is more important for users.<br> > Other non-critical features can be released in a later version.<br> > > Florian Micklich <[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])> > 于2022年11月27日周日 03:01写道：<br> > > > Hi,<br> > > > > I think it really depends on the timing of when 1.0 is released.<br> > > > > In my point if view, the geo operators should be part of the 1.0 <br> > > release as "new features".<br> > > And also focus on the documentation and story line using them O:-)<br> > > > > Florian<br> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Am Freitag, dem 25.11.2022 um 09:27 +0000 schrieb Philipp Zehnder:<br>> > > > Hi,<br><br> > > > > > > I am also in favor of releasing a 1.0 version soon after the 0.90.0<br> > > version.<br><br>> > > > > > > I think we do not need any new features for the 1.0 release.<br> My <br> > > > suggestion would be to focus on usability improvements and bug fixes<br> > > for the 1.0 release.<br><br>> > > > Especially that we have a backward compatible system and users can<br> > > easily update to newer versions.<br><br>> > > > Do you have any ideas how we can ensure this? We need a way to test <br> > > > that<br> > > updates work as expected and do not break anything.<br><br>> > > > It would be cool to have an automated approach to validate this for <br> > > > each<br> > > release.<br><br>> > > > > > > Cheers,<br><br> > > > Philipp<br><br> > > > > > > > > > Von: Dominik Riemer <br> > > > <[[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])](mailto:[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]))><br><br> > > > Datum: Freitag, 25. November 2022 um 07:08<br><br> > > > An: > > > [[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])](mailto:[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])) > > > <br> > > > <[<br> > > [[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])](mailto:[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected]))><br><br>> > > > > > Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Plan to release StreamPipes 1.0<br> Hi <br> > > > Xin,<br><br> > > > > > > thanks for bringing up this important question!<br> The current plan <br> > > > is to release a new version soon together with the TLP<br> > > announcement, which is currently named "0.90.0".<br><br>> > > > > > > I totally agree that a 1.0 version gives more trust to users. So <br> > > > let's<br> > > say we would go for a 1.0 release after 0.90.0, what do you all think <br> > > should be part of this release and what improvements should be done? <br> > > Are any mission-critical features missing?<br><br>> > > > > > > E.g., an important item on my list for the 1.0 release is increased <br> > > > test<br> > > coverage.<br><br>> > > > > > > Cheers<br><br> > > > Dominik<br><br> > > > > > > > > > On 2022/11/25 05:07:54 Xin Wang wrote:<br><br>> > > > > > The current StreamPipes version is 0.70. Do we have a plan to <br> > > > > release<br> > > 1.0?<br><br>> > > > > Because 1.x version may make users feel more mature and stable, <br> > > > > what<br> > > do you<br><br>> > > > > think?<br><br> > > > > > > > > > > > > --<br><br> > > > > Thanks,<br><br> > > > > Xin<br><br> > > > > > > > > > --<br> > Thanks,<br> > Xin<br>
