DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29502>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29502

Extend the Struts framework to allow Struts application to be executed within a JSR168 
portlet.





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2004-06-10 21:44 -------
Joe,

I did look into the struts-chain proposal when I started my framework. 
To me, its state was too vague and at the time to be able to base my framework 
upon. I needed a standard Struts version, not an experimental one. I didn't 
like to build a new framework on top of something which state and future is too 
unclear. 

With true commitment from the Struts developers though this would be different.
I do think it is the way to go. Especially for proper handling the event 
mechanism of portlet interactions. My current implementation really is too 
dependant on the internals of RequestProcessor.

Whatever the implementation though: for Struts users it really shouldn't make 
any difference. Using Struts for portlet development does require a different 
setup/structure of an application because of the restrictions of the portlet 
spec. Other than that a Struts Portlet Framework should be as less intrusive as 
possible I think. That's what I have tried to do with my implementation.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to