So finally whats going on with Struts 1.2.1 Release?
Is it going to be released soon or is still pending on some
dependencies?

Abhishek


On Wed, 2004-06-09 at 05:46, Ted Husted wrote:
> Robert, 
> 
> It's very important to remember that the mere fact we roll a release doesn't mean it 
> will ever get past alpha. The overall average at Jakarta seems to be five or six 
> alpha/beta releases to each stable release. 
> 
> This will be the second point release in the 1.2.x series. It may be voted stable, 
> or it may not. If changes to our dependencies are imminent, then we will be rolling 
> another release before we even have a chance to vote on this one :) 
> 
> At this point, there is *nothing* more important that getting away from this mindset 
> that a release is some type of traumatic event. We should be able to release on "any 
> given Sunday", without all this brouhaha. 
> 
> The reason releases become traumatic is because we wait too long. By releasing this 
> week, we will be in a much better position to release again after JavaOne, when 
> these other matters are sorted out. 
> 
> On the other hand, if we don't release now, and let issues pile on top of issues, 
> then it just all gets more complicated. We end up trying to fix too many things at 
> once, and find ourselves waiting for too many dominoes to fall. Our resources are 
> limited, and we can't stretch them too thin. Point releases should be weeks apart, 
> not months.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 21:28:51 +0100, robert burrell donkin wrote:
> > the major worry for craig was the potential incompatibility with
> > new tomcat releases.
> >
> > since the community seems pretty keen on cutting validator and
> > struts releases whose dependencies which might not work properly in
> > the near future, so i suppose that i've done what i can and you
> > can't say i haven't done my best to warn you :)
> >
> > since the new releases should be binary compatible, it should be
> > possible for users to drop in a different selection of the more
> > modern libraries without these compatibility issues. maybe we could
> > head some of the user questions off by adding something to a page
> > somewhere or to the wiki.
> >
> > - robert
> >
> >
> > On 7 Jun 2004, at 15:48, Ted Husted wrote:
> >
> >
> >> We really should be making releases every few weeks anyway. So,
> >> we can roll a release now and again when the new dependencies
> >> become availability.
> >>
> >> I'm very much opposed to making sweeping dependency changes *
> >> before* releasing what we already have. Been there, done that,
> >> didn't like it, and affirmed it wouldn't happen again. :)
> >>
> >> -Ted.
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to