On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 13:13:43 -0700 (PDT), Don Brown wrote: > I vote we just roll it anyways. If we have switched to tomcat- > style releases, we can just not label it as stable. I asked one of > the tomcat guys last nite at the JakartaOne party if they close out > all their bugs and he laughed :) > > Don
If you want to roll it, Don, that's fine with me. Though, since it's been a year-and-a-day since our last stable release, I was hoping 1.2.1 would be It :) -Ted. > > >> So, if we can solve 29285, it looks like 1.2.1 would be ready to >> roll. >> >> >> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:27:39 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: >> >>> OK, we're down to 4 problem tickets. Two are against the >>> validator, but patches are not available. Two are against >>> Struts-Faces, and could actually be skipped since Struts-Faces >>> would not be in the 1.2.1 release. >>> >>> >>> The release notes are updated, so if we can swat #29285 and >>> #29796, we could try rolling Struts 1.2.1. >>> >>> >>> I'll be away through Thursday. I may have email, but don't know >>> if the connection would be good enough to try and roll a >>> release. >>> >>> >>> If anyone want to jump in, please feel free. >>> >>> >>> -Ted. >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- >>> ---- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------ >> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
