Sounds good! Thanks for taking care of it. -James
-----Original Message----- From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 02, 2004 6:15 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.1 release? OK, I'd like to make one last pass on the documentation to be sure everything seems consistent with the 1.2.1 release, and then roll it Sunday night. We can then vote on whether to promote it past Alpha stage, and, if so, mirror the Beta for community testing. -Ted. On Fri, 02 Jul 2004 16:32:51 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > I changed the bugzilla priority to enhacement for this bug > yesterday - I don't know if the problem is my end but I didn't see > the usual bugzilla email on this list after I made the change, so > I'm posting this here. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29285 > > > Niall > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 11:44 PM > Subject: Re: Struts 1.2.1 release? > > > On Thu, 01 Jul 2004 22:19:39 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote: > >> I agree. >> >> >> Also it seems to me that validwhen was never built to work with >> mapped properties and therefore this should be an enhancement >> request rather than bug. I guess the assumption is that as >> requiredif has been labelled as "deprecated" in favour of >> validwhen, then validwhen should provide at least the same >> functionality as requiredif - including handling mapped >> properties. Even so, if it wasn't designed/built to handle mapped >> properties then its not a bug. >> >> Niall >> > > If you want to change the Severity of this report, Niall, that's > fine with me. > > Though, we might want to document this issue, especially since > validwhen is a new feature. > > -Ted. > > >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 9:13 PM >> Subject: RE: Struts 1.2.1 release? >> >> >>> I vote we just roll it anyways. If we have switched to tomcat- >>> style releases, we can just not label it as stable. I asked >>> one of the tomcat guys last nite at the JakartaOne party if >>> they close out all their bugs and he laughed :) >>> >>> Don >>> >>> >>>> So, if we can solve 29285, it looks like 1.2.1 would be ready >>>> to roll. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 22:27:39 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> OK, we're down to 4 problem tickets. Two are against the >>>>> validator, but patches are not available. Two are against >>>>> Struts-Faces, and could actually be skipped since Struts- >>>>> Faces would not be in the 1.2.1 release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> The release notes are updated, so if we can swat #29285 and >>>>> #29796, we could try rolling Struts 1.2.1. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I'll be away through Thursday. I may have email, but don't >>>>> know if the connection would be good enough to try and roll >>>>> a release. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If anyone want to jump in, please feel free. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -Ted. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
