On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:11:42 +0100, Niall Pemberton wrote:I have also committed a patch for Bug 31060 with the reasoning that if we need to re-create the 1.2.3 release then we should also take the opportunity to fix this bug as well:
If it were just a matter of patching the DTD's on the Struts Example, then I'd say we could reroll the 1.2.3 release.
But if we are making further code changes, then I believe we should move onto 1.2.4.
The only practical difference being whether we apply a 1_2_4 tag or not.
I don't know if there's a protocol about this, but actually, I wasn't quite clear on why Martin was being tentative about describing the release he cut as "officially" 1.2.3. It seems like any time someone goes through the process of building a release and putting it up for review, the number should be incremented. In the new scheme, version numbers are supposed to be "cheap" and there should be no shame in "burning them up".
I don't feel terribly strongly about this.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn back; I'll know I'm in the wrong place."
- Carlos Santana
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
