Steve Raeburn wrote
1. Big reason for not including this as a standard action is the use of '.x'
to identify the method name to dispatch to. The .x suffix has a particular
meaning in HTML (i.e. Image Button) and it would be incorrect/misleading to
subvert it for other uses that have nothing to do with image buttons.
Your critique gave me an idea, Steve. I think that I will avoid that
".x" stuff and just use something like: "method.update" in the HTML.
The result will be the same and no one will get the willies over the
.x. They also will see that the presence of .x is not what it seems to
be. What do you think?
Michael
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
