DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31365>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31365 Add initValue attribute to html:radio tags ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-28 14:38 ------- Niall wrote: > <html:radio property="gender" value="male" initValue="male"/> > <html:radio property="gender" value="female"/> > > ...and presumably if the "gender" property is null, the initValue would be > used rather than the property? Yes, that sounds correct. Joe wrote: > from my first look at the suggested JSP syntax, it seems to require a lot > of repetition I believe someone else proposed a "radiogroup" tag which would reduce the repeating the same values again: <html:radioGroup property="gender" initValue="male"> <html:radio value="male"/> <html:radio value="female"/> </html:radioGroup> However, this prevents people from sequentially "mixing" radio buttons for different properties as you can in HTML, i.e. the following would be impossible: <radio name="param1" value="foo"> <radio name="param2" value="bar"> <radio name="param1" value="bar"> > Where Ricardo indicates that creating and populating the form before > sending the user to the view is "duplicating the work of the Struts > Framework," I'd say that we should be making it straightforward to > do this step. It's a very common issue and users shouldn't be required > to re-solve it. I agree the above should be done, but I feel that it would still not resolve the user's reasonable expectation that, like other HTML taglib elements, the values of an html:radio tag can be initialised in the JSP view. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
