I stirred some more participation though, it looks like ... which is good :-)
Be well!
Eddie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Husted" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2004 2:50 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] HTTPD or Tomcat (once more with feeling) [was Adopt ...]
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 01:23:05 -0500, Eddie Bush wrote:
Most of my concerns are in the Release Guidelines. It's ambiguous to say any release should follow the guidelines of both tomcat and httpd. They're decidedly different with respect to where the emphasis is placed.
If someone can provide a link to the Tomcat Guidelines, we could drop the link to HTTPD.
Or, someone could merge Craig's bullets:
----
* Post what amounts to a release candidate and announce to a limited audience (dev and user lists) asking for testing.
* Testing ensues ...
* Call a vote on the release, with the options to call it alpha, beta, stable (that's fine with me), or withdraw (if there was some bad problem).
* Announce to the world and do the usual process of distributing the bits.
----
with the "Additional remarks" on the Release Guidelines page, to create our own version.
-Ted.
--- avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean. Virus Database (VPS): 0444-0, 10/26/2004 Tested on: 10/26/2004 6:06:50 PM avast! - copyright (c) 2000-2004 ALWIL Software. http://www.avast.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
