--- Original Message --- From: "Ceki G�lc�" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:06:03 +0100 Subject: UGLI instead of JCL?
>�Hi Ted, > >�May I suggest that for Shale you consider switching to UGLI [1] >�instead of JCL because the former causes none of the class loader >�problems of the latter? > >�After spending a week trying to understand and reproduce JCL's >�problems [2] I can confidently state that it is broken beyond >�repair. Anyway, just to let you know... > >�Cheers, > >�[1] http://logging.apache.org/log4j/docs/ugli.html >�[2] http://www.qos.ch/logging/classloader.jsp --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
