Frank, Does this increase the code one must load whether one uses Ajax or not? Thanks!
On Apr 6, 2005 3:16 PM, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'm leaning with you Allen. I didn't like the idea of requiring > something that is essentially outside the taglib at first, but as I > think about it more I think it just makes sense. Besides, I guess one > could argue that the extra config file is already something required > outside the taglib anyway :) > > -- > Frank W. Zammetti > Founder and Chief Software Architect > Omnytex Technologies > http://www.omnytex.com > > Fogleson, Allen wrote: > > Personally I don't see where putting the code inline or forcing the use > > of a .js file through a switch really brings value. If the switch bought > > some value, say advanced features or something then it might make sense. > > Power users could turn on the switch and access these wonderful extra > > features that are not used normally, but the PU might want to use. > > > > Personally I would say force the use of the file from the get go. > > > > Al > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Frank W. Zammetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2005 4:07 PM > > To: Struts Developers List > > Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags > > > > I think the other benefit, although a more subjective one, is that a big > > > > long string of Javascript inline in a tag is kind of ugly. I've > > certainly done it many times, as I'm sure others have, so it isn't the > > end of the world, it's just aesthetically not very pleasing to me. > > > > I like your idea about being able to switch though (I always like more > > flexibility in anything)... I'm not sure I'm convinced it isn't better > > to just make the include required from the get-go, but a switch is > > certainly not a bad option. Not a big deal to implement, I just wonder > > if the benefit isn't a little dubious (i.e., there is probably more to > > be said for not putting the code inline, so why not make it only work > > that way?) > > > > Worth some others' input in any case I think. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
