Jack, Actually my comments were in no way an answer to his proposal. I believe that under the rules of Apache we have already gotten our answer to whether it will be included as a subproject of struts. To be included there must be no vetoing vote by a member of the PMC. (pardon me Martin if I misquote you or I misinterpreted your intent) Martin Cooper is a member of the PMC and basically gave a -1 vote on including it as a subproject.
I do believe there may be value in an ajax struts integration, and the path to that integration is via either the struts.sf.net project or creating another project on SF.net or java.dev.net or something similar. I also concur that there are several technologies available and perhaps a look at creating a more generalized integration should be looked at. I also agree with (I believe it was) Ted, that this is really not a part of struts, but is at most a subproject. Something like Shale. Its just my opinion but struts is not about the view, and this is really view technology we are talking about here. Although it is pretty cool stuff, it just seems to not be aimed at what struts core is really about which is the controller aspects of MVC. Al -----Original Message----- From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 11:36 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: RFC: Struts HTML Ajax-Aware Tags <SNIP> On Apr 7, 2005 9:17 AM, Fogleson, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm, > > I don't know. I checked out the struts 1.3 trunk (including apps, > taglibs, etc) and haven't had much of a problem with being stepped on. I > even submitted a couple patches against the 1.3 dev trunk. > > I will agree that the 1.3 is vastly in flux, but that is likely because > it is undergoing a massive development effort right now. > > I know you are more of a fan of the 1.2 branches but I'm very much > looking forward to 1.3 with commons chain. :) > > Al </SNIP> Answer 7 = "Hmm" or "I just saved $30.00 on Geiko" or "I don't know what your problem is because I am doing something entirely different and don't see why I should care about what you are talking about" Answer 8 = "You are stuck in the past and I am up to date" Frank really is talking about something real here, if anyone wants to see what it is that he is talking about. -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
